By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Women Rights > Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination
CriminalNewsSupreme CourtWomen Rights

Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 6, 2025 8:38 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE


The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that if an alleged rape victim refuses a medical examination, adverse inference can be drawn against their claims. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice NK Singh made this observation while deciding an appeal filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh against a High Court judgment that acquitted the accused in a rape case.

Contents
Legal Precedent CitedCase BackgroundHigh Court Overturned ConvictionWhat Is POCSO Act?


Legal Precedent Cited


Referring to Dola v. State of Odisha (2018) 18 SCC 695, the Court reiterated that denying medical examination raises doubts about the allegations. “It is a well-settled proposition of law that non-allowance of medical examination by an alleged rape victim raises negative inferences against them,” the bench noted.


Case Background


The case stemmed from an FIR filed in 2007 by the father of the alleged victim. He claimed that the accused entered their house in their absence and committed sexual assault on his daughter.
During the medical examination at Regional Hospital, Hamirpur, the prosecutrix was found to be of unsound mind and did not cooperate. To ascertain sexual assault, she was referred to RPMC Hospital, Tanda (Dharamshala). However, her father refused further medical tests.


High Court Overturned Conviction

While the trial court convicted the accused, he was later acquitted.

The High Court noted that the prosecutrix and her parents did not fully cooperate with medical staff. This weakened their version of events. Additionally, the prosecutrix’s mother turned hostile, and her father made evasive statements.
The High Court also observed that the prosecutrix was not mentally unsound, as she could understand and respond during cross-examination. Given these factors and the limited scope of interfering with acquittals, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision.

What Is POCSO Act?

The POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act) protects minors from sexual abuse and exploitation. It defines offenses, sets strict punishments, and ensures child-friendly procedures. Authorities must handle cases sensitively to safeguard victims’ rights.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Acquits Brother-in-law In Dowry Death Case: Emphasizes Need For Clear Evidence Under Section 113B

Bombay High Court Disqualifies Husband Convicted Of Dowry Death From Inheriting Wife’s Property

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Constitutional Provisions, Imposes Rs. 10,000 Fine

TAGGED:Minor ChildrenPOCSOPOCSO ActProtection of Children from Sexual Offences ActSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madhya Pradesh Denial of Education Amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court Grants Divorce
Next Article Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments How To File A Complaint Under The Special Marriage Act
5 Comments
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Constitutional Provisions, Imposes Rs. 10,000 Fine - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: If Medical Experts Determine Hospitalization Is Necessary, Insurers Must Honor Claim: J&K High Court - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Proton Mail Not Blocked in India, Union Govt Informs Karnataka HC - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Medical Negligence: All You Need To Know - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi High Court case
News

Delhi High Court Criticises Delhi Government’s Freebie Policies After Rajendra Nagar Flooding Tragedy

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Calcutta High Court Bar Association Boycotts Proceedings Over Lawyer’s Assault By Police
Outraging Woman’s Modesty Includes Physical and Verbal Acts: Kerala High Court
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 121 – Code of Civil Procedure – Effect Of Rules In First Schedule.

Section 120 – Code of Civil Procedure – Provisions Not Applicable To High Court In Original Civil Jurisdiction.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?