Code: Section 42 – The Specific Relief Act, 1963
Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (e) of section 41, where a contract comprises an affirmative agreement to do a certain act, coupled with a negative agreement, express or implied, not to do a certain act, the circumstance that the court is unable to compel specific performance of the affirmative agreement shall not preclude it from granting an injunction to perform the negative agreement:
Provided that the plaintiff has not failed to perform the contract so far as it is binding on him.
Explanation of Section 42 – Injunctions for Negative Agreements
Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act carves out an important exception to Section 41(e). While courts generally do not grant injunctions to prevent the breach of a contract that cannot be specifically enforced, this section allows an injunction to enforce the negative part of a contract even when the positive part cannot be enforced.
Here’s what it means:
- Contracts may contain two parts:
- An affirmative (positive) agreement – to do something.
- A negative agreement – not to do something.
- Even if the court cannot compel someone to fulfill the positive obligation, it can still issue an injunction to stop them from violating the negative obligation.
- This applies as long as the plaintiff (the person seeking the injunction) has fulfilled their own part of the agreement.
This provision is especially relevant in cases like personal service contracts or exclusive agreements where enforcing performance may be impractical, but preventing the breach is necessary.
Illustration
Example 1: Exclusive Performance Contract
A singer signs a contract with a music label to perform only for them for one year. This includes:
- A positive obligation to perform at events.
- A negative obligation not to perform for any other label.
If the singer refuses to perform, the court may not compel her to sing (positive part), but it can issue an injunction to stop her from performing for another label (negative part), as long as the label has honored its part of the agreement.
Common Questions and Answers on Section 42 – Specific Relief Act
1. What is a “negative agreement”?
It’s a part of a contract where a person agrees not to do a certain act — such as not working for a competitor or not disclosing information.
2. Can a court enforce only part of a contract?
Yes. Under Section 42, even if the court can’t enforce the positive part of the contract, it can still grant an injunction to enforce the negative part.
3. Why is this exception necessary?
Some actions, like personal services, cannot be forced by law. But a party may still need protection from the other side violating the exclusivity or confidentiality part of the contract.
4. Does the plaintiff need to fulfill their part of the contract?
Yes. The plaintiff must have performed or be willing to perform their part of the agreement. If they have breached the contract, they cannot seek protection under Section 42.
5. How is this different from Section 41(e)?
Section 41(e) bars injunctions to enforce contracts that can’t be specifically enforced. Section 42 allows an exception for the negative part of such contracts, provided the plaintiff is not at fault.
Conclusion
Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act balances the limitations on enforcing certain contracts with the need to uphold legal obligations. Even when courts cannot compel a person to perform their duties under a contract, they can still prevent them from doing something that violates the contract. This section helps protect exclusivity, confidentiality, and non-compete clauses in a lawful and enforceable manner.
For more easy-to-understand legal resources, visit ApniLaw.
