By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 16 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Presumption As To Registered Documents Relating To Adoptions.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act > Section 16 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Presumption As To Registered Documents Relating To Adoptions.
The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act

Section 16 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Presumption As To Registered Documents Relating To Adoptions.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 8, 2025 5:45 pm
Apni Law
4 months ago
Share
Section 16 - The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act - Presumption As To Registered Documents Relating To Adoptions
Section 16 - The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act - Presumption As To Registered Documents Relating To Adoptions
SHARE

Code: Section 16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

“Whenever any document registered under any law for the time being in force is produced before any court purporting to record an adoption made and is signed by the person giving and the person taking the child in adoption, the court shall presume that the adoption has been made in compliance with the provisions of this Act unless and until it is disproved.”


State Amendment – Uttar Pradesh

In Uttar Pradesh, Section 16 has been amended as follows:

“Section 16 shall be re-numbered as sub-section (1) and the following shall be inserted as sub-section (2):

(2) In case any adoption is made on or after the first day of January, 1977, no Court in Uttar Pradesh shall accept any evidence in proof of the giving and taking of the child in adoption, except a document recording an adoption, made and signed by the person giving and the person taking the child in adoption, and registered under any law for the time being in force:

Provided that secondary evidence of such document shall be admissible in the circumstances and manner laid down in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.”

[Vide Uttar Pradesh Act 57 of 1976, s. 35]


Explanation of Section 16

Section 16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act creates a legal presumption in favor of registered adoption documents. If a document that records an adoption is registered under applicable law and signed by both the giver and taker of the child, courts must presume that the adoption has been validly made under the Act.

Contents
Code: Section 16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956State Amendment – Uttar PradeshExplanation of Section 16Uttar Pradesh Amendment HighlightsIllustrationsExample 1: Presumption of Valid AdoptionExample 2: Uttar Pradesh RestrictionCommon Questions and Answers1. What does Section 16 of the Act imply?2. Is the presumption under Section 16 final?3. What is the impact of the Uttar Pradesh amendment to Section 16?4. Can oral evidence be used to prove adoption in Uttar Pradesh?5. What qualifies as a valid adoption document under Section 16?Conclusion

This presumption can, however, be rebutted if there is evidence to the contrary. The provision is designed to reduce unnecessary litigation and give authenticity to properly documented adoptions.

Uttar Pradesh Amendment Highlights

In Uttar Pradesh, the rules are stricter. For adoptions made after January 1, 1977:

  • No oral or alternative evidence is accepted unless the registered adoption document is produced.
  • Only a properly signed and registered adoption deed will be considered valid primary evidence.
  • Secondary evidence of such a document may be accepted under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Illustrations

Example 1: Presumption of Valid Adoption

A registered adoption deed signed by both adoptive and biological parents is presented in court. The court presumes the adoption is valid under Section 16 unless someone provides strong evidence to prove otherwise.

Example 2: Uttar Pradesh Restriction

In a case in Uttar Pradesh, a man claims to have adopted a child in 1980 but provides only oral testimony. The court rejects the claim, stating that under the amended Section 16, only a registered document is acceptable proof of adoption.


Common Questions and Answers

1. What does Section 16 of the Act imply?

It creates a legal presumption that a registered adoption document is proof of a valid adoption unless disproved.

2. Is the presumption under Section 16 final?

No. It is a rebuttable presumption, which means the court will accept the adoption as valid unless there is evidence to the contrary.

3. What is the impact of the Uttar Pradesh amendment to Section 16?

For adoptions made in Uttar Pradesh on or after January 1, 1977, no court will accept proof of adoption unless a registered document is submitted.

4. Can oral evidence be used to prove adoption in Uttar Pradesh?

No. Oral or alternative evidence is not acceptable unless secondary evidence of the registered adoption deed meets the standards of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

5. What qualifies as a valid adoption document under Section 16?

A document that is:

  • Registered under existing law,
  • Signed by both the person giving and the person taking the child in adoption.

Conclusion

Section 16 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, provides significant evidentiary value to registered adoption documents. It helps establish adoption validity with fewer disputes and enhances legal clarity. The Uttar Pradesh amendment strengthens the requirement further by mandating the production of registered documentation for proving adoption in court. This provision is central to safeguarding the integrity and legality of the adoption process in India.

For legal guidance on adoption procedures, documentation, or family law matters, visit ApniLaw.


You Might Also Like

Section 15 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA)- Valid Adoption Not To Be Cancelled.

Section 25 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Amount Of Maintenance May Be Altered On Change Of Circumstances.

Section 23 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Amount Of Maintenance.

Section 17 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Prohibition Of Certain Payments.

Section 11 – The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (HAMA) – Other Conditions For A Valid Adoption.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To File For Divorce In India Mental Disorders Like Schizophrenia Not Enough for Divorce, Living Conditions Must Be Severe: Patna High Court
Next Article High Court of Jammu & Kashmir Father Not Liable To Pay Maintenance To Able-bodied, Unmarried, Adult Daughters Under Section 488 of J&K CrPC: J&K High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
New York Times vs OpenAI: Is India's Legal System Prepared for AI Challenges?
News

New York Times vs OpenAI: Is India’s Legal System Prepared for AI Challenges?

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases Under Section 125 CrPC: Kerala High Court
Calcutta High Court Bar Association Boycotts Proceedings Over Lawyer’s Assault By Police
Supreme Court Declares Royalty Under MMDR Act Is Not A Tax
Supreme Court To Hear Petition Against Demolition Of Mangolpuri Mosque On August 1
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Narcotics & Drugs

Drug Inspectors: Powers, Duties, and Inspections Under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act (Sections 21, 22)

Party Drugs NDPS

How Drugs Are Regulated in India: Central vs State Powers (Section 5 & 6 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?