By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 36 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Child Not To See Accused At The Time Of Testifying.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > POCSO > Section 36 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Child Not To See Accused At The Time Of Testifying.
POCSO

Section 36 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Child Not To See Accused At The Time Of Testifying.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 13, 2025 9:49 am
Apni Law
2 months ago
Share
Section 36 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) - Child Not To See Accused At The Time Of Testifying
Section 36 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) - Child Not To See Accused At The Time Of Testifying
SHARE

Code: Section 36

(1) The Special Court shall ensure that the child is not exposed in anyway to the accused at the time of recording of the evidence, while at the same time ensuring that the accused is in a position to hear the statement of the child and communicate with his advocate.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), the Special Court may record the statement of a child through video conferencing or by utilising single visibility mirrors or curtains or any other device.


Explanation of Section 36 POCSO

Section 36 of the POCSO Act is a critical child protection provision that ensures the child is not traumatized or intimidated by direct interaction with the accused during testimony. The law recognizes the sensitivity of children and mandates the creation of a safe and secure environment for recording their statements.

Contents
Code: Section 36Explanation of Section 36 POCSOKey ProvisionsIllustrationsIllustration 1: Use of Video ConferencingIllustration 2: One-Way Mirror SetupIllustration 3: Use of CurtainsCommon Questions & Answers on Section 36 POCSO1. Why is the child protected from seeing the accused?2. Does this violate the accused’s right to a fair trial?3. What methods can be used to prevent visual exposure?4. Is the use of technology like video conferencing mandatory?5. Can the child be accompanied during testimony?Conclusion

Key objectives of this section include:

  • Preventing the child from seeing or being physically exposed to the accused during testimony.
  • Balancing the rights of the accused by ensuring they can hear the child’s statement and communicate with their advocate.
  • Allowing the use of modern tools such as video conferencing, one-way mirrors, curtains, or other privacy-protecting devices to achieve the above.

This approach fosters a child-friendly environment in the courtroom while preserving fair trial rights for the accused.


Key Provisions

  • Shielding the Child: The child must not come into direct visual contact with the accused while testifying.
  • Use of Technology or Barriers: Special Courts may employ video conferencing, one-way mirrors, or curtains to ensure visual separation.
  • Right of the Accused: The accused must be able to hear the child’s testimony and consult with their legal counsel during the proceedings.

Illustrations

Illustration 1: Use of Video Conferencing

A 10-year-old child is a victim in a POCSO case. The Special Court arranges for the child to testify from a separate room via live video feed. The accused is present in the courtroom and can hear the testimony and consult with their lawyer, but the child does not see them.

Illustration 2: One-Way Mirror Setup

In another case, the Special Court installs a one-way visibility mirror in the courtroom. The child gives testimony in a protected enclosure, where they cannot see the accused, though the accused and their counsel can hear the statement and observe proceedings.

Illustration 3: Use of Curtains

A courtroom uses a physical curtain barrier to shield the child from the accused while allowing the accused to hear the testimony. The child’s guardian is also present to provide emotional support, as allowed under Section 33(4) of the Act.


Common Questions & Answers on Section 36 POCSO

1. Why is the child protected from seeing the accused?

To prevent further trauma, fear, or intimidation, and to create a safe space for the child to give truthful and confident testimony.

2. Does this violate the accused’s right to a fair trial?

No. Section 36 ensures that while the child is protected, the accused still hears the testimony and can coordinate with their legal counsel, preserving fair trial rights.

3. What methods can be used to prevent visual exposure?

Video conferencing, one-way mirrors, physical barriers like curtains, or any device that serves the purpose of shielding the child while allowing communication flow in the courtroom.

4. Is the use of technology like video conferencing mandatory?

No. It is one of the options available to the Court. The method used depends on the Court’s discretion and available infrastructure.

5. Can the child be accompanied during testimony?

Yes. As per Section 33(4), the Special Court may allow a trusted person, such as a parent or guardian, to be present for emotional support.


Conclusion

Section 36 of the POCSO Act is a child-centric provision that underscores the importance of a safe, non-intimidating environment during judicial proceedings. It ensures that a child victim is protected from further trauma while testifying, without compromising the rights of the accused. Through the integration of protective technologies and thoughtful courtroom arrangements, the law upholds justice and child welfare in tandem.

For more simplified legal insights and updates on POCSO and other Indian laws, visit ApniLaw – your guide to understanding law with clarity and confidence.


You Might Also Like

Section 27 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Medical Examination Of A Child.

Section 25 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Recording Of Statement Of A Child By Magistrate.

Section 7 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Sexual Assault.

Section 29 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Presumption As To Certain Offences.

Section 3 – Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) – Penetrative Sexual Assault.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Andhra Pradesh Compensation In Motor Accident Case, Married Daughters Are Eligible: Andhra Pradesh HC
Next Article How To File a RTI (Right to Information) Application RTI Penalty Requires Prior Notice to Responsible Officer: Jharkhand HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024
Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
Foreign Nationality Not a Ground to Deny Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?