By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 33 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Offence Of Non-Reporting.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > Juvenile Justice Act > Section 33 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Offence Of Non-Reporting.
Juvenile Justice Act

Section 33 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Offence Of Non-Reporting.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 15, 2025 6:49 pm
Apni Law
2 months ago
Share
Section 33 - The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Offence Of Non-Reporting
Section 33 - The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Offence Of Non-Reporting
SHARE

Code

If information regarding a child as required under section 32 is not given within the period specified in the said section, then, such act shall be regarded as an offence.

 Explanation

Section 33 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 deals with the mandatory obligation to report children in need of care and protection. It specifies that failure to provide the required information about such a child, as outlined in Section 32, within the prescribed time, constitutes a punishable offence under the Act.

Contents
Code Explanation Key Highlights Illustration Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Conclusion

This provision ensures accountability and timeliness in bringing vulnerable children under legal protection. It deters individuals or institutions from ignoring their duty to report cases involving children who may be abandoned, orphaned, lost, or in distress.

 Key Highlights

  • Applies to individuals, institutions, NGOs, hospitals, or any person who comes in contact with a child in need of care and protection.

  • If they fail to report as required under Section 32, it becomes a legal offence.

  • Reinforces the legal duty of immediate reporting to the Child Welfare Committee, police, or designated authorities.

 Illustration

 Example 1: A hospital receives an abandoned newborn. If the hospital staff do not inform the Child Welfare Committee or the police as mandated under Section 32, they are committing an offence under Section 33.

 Example 2: A teacher notices signs of abuse on a student but fails to report it to the appropriate authorities. This negligence amounts to an offence under this section.

 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is required under Section 32?
A: Section 32 requires any person or organization that finds or becomes aware of a child in need of care and protection to report it to the Child Welfare Committee, police, or child helpline without delay.

Q2: Who can be held accountable under Section 33?
A: Any person or institution (including hospitals, schools, NGOs, etc.) who fails to report such information as required.

Q3: Is there a specific time frame for reporting?
A: Yes, the report must be made immediately, as per the timeframe stipulated under Section 32.

Q4: What are the consequences of non-reporting?
A: It is treated as an offence, and legal action can be initiated against the person or organization responsible.

 Conclusion

Section 33 reinforces the legal and moral responsibility of individuals and institutions to act promptly when they encounter children in distress or in need of care and protection. It ensures swift intervention by the authorities and accountability for negligence.

You Might Also Like

Section 89 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Offence Committed By Child Under This Chapter.

Section 54 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Inspection Of Institutions Registered Under This Act.

Section 85 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Offences Committed On Disabled Children.

Section 3 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – General Principles To Be Followed In Administration Of Act.

Section 63 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Effect Of Adoption.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madras Caste-based Identities In School Names Leads To Division and Enmity: Madras HC
Next Article Section 41 - The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act - Registration Of Child Care Institutions Section 41 – The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act – Registration Of Child Care Institutions.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC's Ruling on Muslim Woman's Right to Divorce via 'Khula'
CriminalFamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtMarriage and DivorceNews

Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases Under Section 125 CrPC: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Re-Testing Of Drugs in NDPS Cases Allowed Only in Rare Situations: Rajasthan HC
No Maintenance for Educated Wife Choosing Unemployment: Delhi HC
Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC
Must Cooperate With The Investigation: Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection To YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia In Obscenity Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Bombay

Mere Loan Recovery not Amount to Abetment to Suicide: Bombay HC

Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges

Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?