By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 114 IPC: Abettor Present When Offence Committed
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > IPC > Section 114 IPC: Abettor Present When Offence Committed
IPC

Section 114 IPC: Abettor Present When Offence Committed

Apni Law
Last updated: June 11, 2024 4:39 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 114 IPC: Abettor Present When Offence Committed

Contents
1. State the Code2. Explain It3. Illustrate It4. Common Questions and Answers

1. State the Code

Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) states:

“Whoever, being present at the time when an offence is committed, intentionally aids, by acts or illegal omissions, the commission of such offence, shall be deemed an abettor of such offence.”

2. Explain It

Section 114 IPC deals with the situation where a person is present at the scene when an offence is being committed and intentionally helps in its commission. This help can be provided through acts (doing something to facilitate the crime) or illegal omissions (failing to do something that could have prevented the crime).

For a person to be considered an abettor under this section, the following conditions must be met:

  • The person must be presentF at the scene of the crime.
  • The person must intentionally aid in the commission of the offence.
  • The aid must be provided through acts or illegal omissions.

3. Illustrate It

Let’s consider an example:

A and B decide to rob a shop. A enters the shop and threatens the shopkeeper with a knife while B stands outside, keeping watch. B sees the shopkeeper struggling and calls out to A, encouraging him to continue the robbery. In this scenario, both A and B are abettors under Section 114 IPC. A is the main offender, while B is the abettor present at the scene, aiding in the crime by keeping watch and encouraging A.

4. Common Questions and Answers

  • Q: What is the difference between abetment by act and abetment by illegal omission?
  • A: Abetment by act involves actively doing something to aid the crime, like providing a weapon or distracting the victim. Abetment by illegal omission involves failing to do something that could have prevented the crime, like failing to report the crime or failing to help the victim.
  • Q: Does presence at the scene have to be physical?
  • A: No, presence at the scene can be physical or constructive. For example, a person directing the crime from a distance, or a person watching the crime unfold on a CCTV screen, can be considered present at the scene.
  • Q: What is the punishment for abetment under Section 114 IPC?
  • A: The punishment for abetment under this section is the same as the punishment for the offence itself, unless a lesser punishment is specifically prescribed for abetment.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 265E: Disposal of Cases – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 336 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence Of Public Servants, Experts, Police Officers In Certain Cases.

CrPC Section 441: Bond of Accused & Sureties – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 215 CrPC: Effect of Errors in Criminal Procedure – Explained

Section 148 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Dispersal Of Assembly By Use Of Civil Force

TAGGED:AbetmentAccessoryAccompliceCriminal LawCriminal LiabilityIndiaIndian Penal CodeIPC Section 114LawLegalPresent at Offence
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Indian Penal Code Section 11: Definition of “Person”
Next Article IPC Section 12: Public Nuisance in India
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?
NewsSupreme Court

Motor Accident Claims / Compensation Can’t Be Reduced Merely Because Dependents Took Over Business Of Deceased : Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Tax Dept Cannot Indefinitely Attach Properties Without Action For Resolvement: Delhi HC
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
Only Family Court Can Decide Marital Status Disputes: Orissa HC
Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Work Related Injury to Employee

Denying Regularization To Temporary Workers After 8 Years of Service Is Unfair, Says HP High Court

High Court of Jammu & Kashmir

Alibi Defence Can’t Justify Quashing Charge Sheet Before Trial, Says J&K High Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?