By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: IPC Section 203: Giving False Information Regarding an Offence
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > IPC > IPC Section 203: Giving False Information Regarding an Offence
IPC

IPC Section 203: Giving False Information Regarding an Offence

Apni Law
Last updated: June 24, 2025 9:24 am
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

IPC Section 203: Giving False Information Regarding an Offence

Contents
1. Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:Q: What is the intention behind giving false information?Q: Who is considered a “public servant” under this section?Q: What is the punishment for violating this section?

1. Code:

Giving false information respecting an offence committed.—Whoever, knowing or having
reason to believe that an offence has been committed, gives any information respecting that offence which
he knows or believes to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

1
[Explanation.—In sections 201 and 202 and in this section the word “offence” includes any act
committed at any place out of 2
[India], which, if committed in 2
[India], would be punishable under any of
the following sections, namely, 302, 304, 382, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 402, 435, 436, 449,
450, 457, 458, 459 and 460.]

2. Explanation:

This section states that whoever, intending to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, any person to be prosecuted for an offence, gives, or causes to be given, to any person who is, or who is likely to be, a public servant, any information which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

3. Illustration:

Imagine a person named A has a grudge against another person named B. A decides to frame B for a theft that never occurred. To achieve this, A goes to the police and tells them that he saw B stealing a valuable item from a shop. A knows this information is false, but he provides it intentionally to cause B to be prosecuted for theft. In this scenario, A has committed an offense under Section 203 of the IPC.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: What is the intention behind giving false information?

A: The intention must be to cause the prosecution of another person for an offense. It is not enough to merely provide false information.

Q: Who is considered a “public servant” under this section?

A: The term “public servant” is defined in the IPC and includes individuals holding various government positions, such as police officers, judges, and government officials.

Q: What is the punishment for violating this section?

A: The punishment can be imprisonment of up to two years, a fine, or both.

You Might Also Like

Section 3 CrPC: Construction of References in Code of Criminal Procedure

IPC 106: Right of Private Defense Against Deadly Assault to Protect Innocents

Section 383 CrPC: Procedure for Appellants in Jail – Indian Criminal Procedure Code

IPC Section 208: Fraudulent Decree for Sum Not Due

CrPC Section 288: Return of Commission – Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:Criminal LawDeceptionFalse InformationIndian Penal CodeIPCMisinformationObstruction of JusticeOffenceSection 203
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article IPC Section 20: Court of Justice – Indian Penal Code
Next Article Section 1 - Hindu Marriage Act - Short Title And Extent Section 1 – Hindu Marriage Act – Short Title And Extent.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Police Station
DocumentationNews

What Is The General Diary Of The Police And How Is It Related To An FIR?

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
BNSS Section 69 Criminalizes Sexual Intercourse Obtained Through Deceitful Means: Orissa HC
SC or ST Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Members of the Same Community: Punjab & Haryana HC
Supreme Court Directs Petitioner To Karnataka High Court For Landslide Rescue Operations
Supreme Court Denies Interim Relief to Kerala in Dispute Over Additional Borrowing
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Work Related Injury to Employee

Denying Regularization To Temporary Workers After 8 Years of Service Is Unfair, Says HP High Court

High Court of Jammu & Kashmir

Alibi Defence Can’t Justify Quashing Charge Sheet Before Trial, Says J&K High Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?