By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement
CrPC

Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement

Apni Law
Last updated: November 25, 2024 8:55 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement

Contents
1. Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:

1. Code:

Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

2. Explanation:

This section deals with the confirmation or imposition of a new sentence by the High Court in cases where a lower court has convicted a person. It mandates that the High Court judgment confirming or altering the sentence must be signed by **two** judges.

3. Illustration:

A Sessions Court convicts a person of theft and sentences them to 3 years imprisonment. The accused appeals to the High Court. The High Court, after reviewing the case, finds that the sentence is inadequate and decides to enhance it to 5 years. According to Section 369, the judgment of the High Court confirming or altering the sentence must be signed by two judges.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: Why does Section 369 require two judges to sign the judgment?
A: This requirement ensures judicial scrutiny and the involvement of multiple judges in significant decisions impacting the liberty of individuals.

Q: Can a single judge of the High Court confirm or alter a sentence?
A: No. Section 369 explicitly requires two judges to sign the judgment.

Q: What happens if the High Court alters the sentence?
A: The altered sentence becomes the final and binding sentence on the accused.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 181: Place of Trial for Specific Offences

CrPC Section 465: Reversible Errors, Omissions, and Irregularities in Findings or Sentences

Section 254 CrPC: Procedure When Not Convicted – Indian Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 282: Interpreter’s Duty of Truthful Interpretation

Section 76 CrPC: Arrest and Prompt Appearance Before Court

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 364: Judgment Translation Requirements – India Law
Next Article Section 374 CrPC: Appeals from Convictions – Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Kerala HC
Kerala High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Husband’s Disinterest In Family Life And Insistence On Superstitious Beliefs Amounted To Mental Cruelty: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
NDPS Act Search & Seizure Provisions in Landmark Judgment
Supreme Court: Compensation Can Exceed Claimed Amount If Just And Reasonable
IPC 420, Mere Breach of Contract Not Enough Unless Clear Intent Is Present For Criminal Charges: Gauhati HC
Supreme Court, Specific Relief Act, Contract Law, Legal News, Execution Proceedings, Justice JB Pardiwala, Justice Manoj Misra
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?