By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement
CrPC

Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement

Apni Law
Last updated: November 25, 2024 8:55 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 369 CrPC: Confirmation or New Sentence – Two Judge Signature Requirement

Contents
1. Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:

1. Code:

Section 369 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

2. Explanation:

This section deals with the confirmation or imposition of a new sentence by the High Court in cases where a lower court has convicted a person. It mandates that the High Court judgment confirming or altering the sentence must be signed by **two** judges.

3. Illustration:

A Sessions Court convicts a person of theft and sentences them to 3 years imprisonment. The accused appeals to the High Court. The High Court, after reviewing the case, finds that the sentence is inadequate and decides to enhance it to 5 years. According to Section 369, the judgment of the High Court confirming or altering the sentence must be signed by two judges.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: Why does Section 369 require two judges to sign the judgment?
A: This requirement ensures judicial scrutiny and the involvement of multiple judges in significant decisions impacting the liberty of individuals.

Q: Can a single judge of the High Court confirm or alter a sentence?
A: No. Section 369 explicitly requires two judges to sign the judgment.

Q: What happens if the High Court alters the sentence?
A: The altered sentence becomes the final and binding sentence on the accused.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 153: Inspection of Weights and Measures – Legal Guide

Section 395 CrPC: Reference to High Court – Code of Criminal Procedure Explained

Section 205 CrPC: Magistrate’s Discretion to Dispense with Accused’s Personal Attendance

Section 332 CrPC: Accused Appearance Before Magistrate or Court – Procedure Explained

Section 444 CrPC: Discharge of Sureties – Code of Criminal Procedure

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 364: Judgment Translation Requirements – India Law
Next Article Section 374 CrPC: Appeals from Convictions – Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
News

Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Lack Of Motive Does Not Weaken Prosecution’s Case If Evidence Proves Guilt: SC
Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI
Consensual Love Among Teenagers Should Not Be Criminalized Under POCSO: Delhi HC
Supreme Court Denies Pension Claims Of UP Roadways Employees Under Provident Fund Scheme
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Who Is Eligible for Free Legal Aid Under the Legal Services Authorities Act? (Section 12)

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Calcutta HC Takes Up Pleas for Independent Probe in Law College Rape Case Amid SIT Investigation

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?