By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 242 CrPC: Evidence for Prosecution – Code of Criminal Procedure
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 242 CrPC: Evidence for Prosecution – Code of Criminal Procedure
CrPC

Section 242 CrPC: Evidence for Prosecution – Code of Criminal Procedure

Apni Law
Last updated: April 9, 2024 12:00 am
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 242 CrPC: Evidence for Prosecution – Code of Criminal Procedure

1. State the code

Section 242 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) deals with the evidence required for the prosecution in a criminal case.

2. Explain it

Section 242 states that:

  • The prosecution must prove every fact essential to constitute the offence charged against the accused.
  • The burden of proving such facts lies on the prosecution.
  • The accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by the prosecution.

This means that the prosecution has the responsibility of presenting sufficient evidence to convince the court beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime. The accused is not required to prove their innocence.

3. Illustrate it

Consider a case where someone is charged with theft. The prosecution must prove the following facts:

  • That the property in question was stolen.
  • That the accused took the property without the owner’s consent.
  • That the accused intended to permanently deprive the owner of the property.

The prosecution may present evidence such as eyewitness testimonies, CCTV footage, or fingerprints to support their case. If the prosecution fails to prove these facts beyond a reasonable doubt, the accused will be acquitted.

4. Common Questions and Answers

  • Q: Does the accused have to testify in their own defense?

    A: No, the accused has the right to remain silent and does not have to testify against themselves. However, if the accused chooses to testify, their testimony can be used against them by the prosecution.
  • Q: Can the prosecution rely on circumstantial evidence?

    A: Yes, circumstantial evidence can be used to prove the guilt of the accused. However, the prosecution must establish a chain of circumstances that point conclusively to the guilt of the accused.
  • Q: What happens if the prosecution fails to prove its case?

    A: If the prosecution fails to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the accused will be acquitted. This means that the accused will be declared not guilty and released from any charges.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 91: Summons for Documents and Things

Indian Penal Code: Title and Extent of Operation

Exhumation Of Gopan Swami’s Body To Proceed, Rules Kerala High Court

Section 248 CrPC: Acquittal or Conviction – Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 187: Summons or Warrant for Offence Beyond Local Jurisdiction

TAGGED:CourtCriminal LawCriminal ProcedureCrPCEvidenceIndiaLawLegalProsecutionSection 242Trial
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11 Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11
Next Article Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Orders Husband To Pay Rs. 2 Crores As Alimony
News

Supreme Court Orders Husband To Pay Rs. 2 Crores As Alimony

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Mere Suspicion Of Extramarital Affair Does Not Fulfill Ground for Abetment Of Suicide: Delhi HC
No Refund of Court Fees for Private Settlements: Rules Supreme Court
Employee’s Widow Is Entitled To Pension & Compensation For Extreme Service Conditions: Delhi High Court
Murder Of Wrong Person Still Counts As Intent Under IPC 301: Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?