By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 318 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In High Court.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 318 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In High Court.
BNSS

Section 318 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In High Court.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 18, 2025 6:05 pm
Apni Law
7 months ago
Share
Section 318 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In High Court
Section 318 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In High Court
SHARE

Code: Section 318 BNSS

318.
Every High Court may, by general rule, prescribe the manner in which the evidence of witnesses and the examination of the accused shall be taken down in cases coming before it, and such evidence and examination shall be taken down in accordance with such rule.


Explanation of Section 318 BNSS

Section 318 BNSS empowers each High Court to establish a general rule that governs the procedures for recording the evidence of witnesses and the examination of the accused in cases that come before it. The key points of this section are:

  • Authority of the High Court:
    Every High Court has the discretionary power to formulate and prescribe the manner in which evidence is to be recorded. This ensures consistency and standardization in the recording of testimony and examination across cases within its jurisdiction.

  • Application of the Prescribed Rules:
    Once the High Court has established these rules, all evidence of witnesses and examinations of the accused in cases before the Court must be taken down in strict accordance with the prescribed manner. This requirement promotes procedural uniformity and helps maintain the integrity of the judicial record.

  • Flexibility and Adaptability:
    The provision allows each High Court to tailor its rules to suit the practical needs and circumstances of its jurisdiction. This flexibility can accommodate variations in types of cases, technological advancements, or local administrative requirements.


Illustration

Example 1: Standardized Recording of Witness Evidence

A High Court in a particular state adopts a general rule that mandates the use of a specific digital recording system for taking down witness testimonies. In every case, witnesses’ evidence is recorded using this system, ensuring that the records are clear, consistent, and easily accessible for review by all parties involved.

Example 2: Examination of the Accused

In a criminal trial, the High Court has prescribed detailed guidelines on how the examination of the accused is to be conducted and recorded. This rule requires that the entire examination be transcribed verbatim and that any objections or deviations during the examination be noted. The examination is then submitted as part of the official record in strict compliance with the High Court’s rule.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 318 BNSS

1. Who has the authority to prescribe the manner in which evidence is taken down?

  • Answer:
    Every High Court has the authority to prescribe, by general rule, the manner in which the evidence of witnesses and the examination of the accused are recorded in the cases before it.

2. What must be done with the evidence and examination once the High Court has prescribed its rules?

  • Answer:
    All evidence of witnesses and the examination of the accused in cases coming before the High Court must be taken down in accordance with the prescribed rule, ensuring consistency and standardization in the records.

3. Why is it important for a High Court to prescribe a manner for recording evidence?

  • Answer:
    Prescribing a standardized manner for recording evidence helps maintain the integrity and reliability of the judicial record, ensures procedural uniformity, and facilitates easier review and appeal processes by ensuring that all evidence is recorded consistently.

4. Can the rules prescribed by the High Court be tailored to local needs?

  • Answer:
    Yes, each High Court may tailor its rules to suit the practical needs and circumstances of its jurisdiction, allowing for flexibility in handling diverse types of cases and technological advancements.

Conclusion

Section 318 BNSS empowers each High Court to establish general rules governing the recording of evidence and the examination of the accused. By mandating that all evidence and examinations be taken down in accordance with these rules, the provision ensures consistency, reliability, and transparency in the judicial process. This framework not only upholds the integrity of the legal record but also facilitates efficient case management and review. For further legal insights and detailed guidance on evidentiary procedures, visit ApniLaw.

Contents
Code: Section 318 BNSSExplanation of Section 318 BNSSIllustrationExample 1: Standardized Recording of Witness EvidenceExample 2: Examination of the AccusedCommon Questions and Answers on Section 318 BNSS1. Who has the authority to prescribe the manner in which evidence is taken down?2. What must be done with the evidence and examination once the High Court has prescribed its rules?3. Why is it important for a High Court to prescribe a manner for recording evidence?4. Can the rules prescribed by the High Court be tailored to local needs?Conclusion

You Might Also Like

Section 443 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Power Of High Court To Withdraw Or Transfer Revision Cases.

CrPC Section 471: Exclusion of Court Closure Dates – Explained

Section 103 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Persons In Charge Of Closed Place To Allow Search.

Section 308 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused.

Section 32 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Aid To Person, Other Than Police Officer, Executing Warrant.

TAGGED:Court RulesCriminal ProcedureEvidence LawEvidence RecordingExamination of AccusedHigh CourtJudicial PracticeLegal ProcedureProcedural LawWitness Testimony
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 310 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In Warrant-Cases Section 310 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Warrant-Cases.
Next Article Section 322 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Parties May Examine Witnesses Section 322 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Parties May Examine Witnesses.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Police Station
DocumentationNews

What Is The General Diary Of The Police And How Is It Related To An FIR?

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Father Not Liable To Pay Maintenance To Able-bodied, Unmarried, Adult Daughters Under Section 488 of J&K CrPC: J&K High Court
Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC
Insurers Cannot Deny Claims for Non-Renewal of State Permit: Supreme Court
Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case, Orders Rs. 28.5 Lakh Fine
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Accident Compensation Under the MV Act: What Victims and Families Should Know (Sections 166–168)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?