By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 311 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Trial Before Court Of Session.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 311 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Trial Before Court Of Session.
BNSS

Section 311 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Trial Before Court Of Session.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 18, 2025 4:29 pm
Apni Law
7 months ago
Share
Section 311 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In Trial Before Court Of Session
Section 311 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In Trial Before Court Of Session
SHARE

Code: Section 311 BNSS

311. (1) In all trials before a Court of Session, the evidence of each witness shall, as his examination proceeds, be taken down in writing either by the presiding Judge himself or by his dictation in open Court, or under his direction and superintendence, by an officer of the Court appointed by him in this behalf.
(2) Such evidence shall ordinarily be taken down in the form of a narrative, but the presiding Judge may, in his discretion, take down, or cause to be taken down, any part of such evidence in the form of question and answer.
(3) The evidence so taken down shall be signed by the presiding Judge and shall form part of the record.


Explanation of Section 311 BNSS

Section 311 BNSS establishes the method by which the evidence of a witness is recorded in a Court of Session. The key aspects of this provision include:

  • Recording of Evidence:
    The entire testimony of a witness, as it is given, must be recorded in writing. This may be done directly by the presiding Judge or by an officer of the Court appointed for that purpose under the Judge’s supervision. This ensures that every detail of the witness’s evidence is captured accurately.

  • Form of the Record:
    The evidence is ordinarily recorded in a narrative form, meaning it is written as a continuous account of the testimony. However, the presiding Judge has the discretion to record parts of the evidence in a question-and-answer format if he deems it necessary. This flexibility allows the record to reflect the dynamic nature of the examination more effectively.

  • Certification and Incorporation into the Record:
    Once recorded, the evidence must be signed by the presiding Judge. This signature certifies that the evidence has been taken in accordance with the established procedures and that it forms a part of the official record of the case.

This section is critical for maintaining a complete, accurate, and officially sanctioned record of witness testimony, which is essential for ensuring fairness and transparency in judicial proceedings.


Illustration

Example 1: Narrative Recording in a Criminal Trial

In a criminal trial before a Court of Session, a witness provides detailed testimony regarding the events in question. The presiding Judge directly records the witness’s narrative testimony during the examination. Once completed, the Judge signs the record, which then becomes part of the case file, ensuring that the testimony is preserved for review on appeal or for any subsequent proceedings.

Example 2: Question-and-Answer Format

During a complex commercial dispute, a witness’s testimony covers a series of technical questions. The presiding Judge opts to record the testimony in a question-and-answer format to clearly capture the details of the examination. This format helps in isolating key points and makes it easier for the parties and the Court to refer back to specific parts of the testimony. After recording, the Judge signs the document, thereby incorporating it into the official record.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 311 BNSS

1. Who is responsible for taking down a witness’s evidence in a Court of Session?

  • Answer:
    The evidence is taken down either by the presiding Judge himself or by an officer appointed by the Judge, under his direction and superintendence.

2. In what form is the evidence usually recorded?

  • Answer:
    The evidence is ordinarily recorded in a narrative form. However, the presiding Judge may choose to record parts of the testimony in a question-and-answer format if it is more appropriate for the case.

3. What ensures the authenticity of the recorded evidence?

  • Answer:
    The recorded evidence is signed by the presiding Judge, which certifies that it is a true and complete account of the witness’s testimony. This signed record forms an integral part of the case file.

4. Can the format of the recorded evidence be changed at the Judge’s discretion?

  • Answer:
    Yes, while the default is a narrative format, the presiding Judge has the discretion to record any part of the evidence in a question-and-answer format if he believes it will better serve the interests of clarity and fairness.

Conclusion

Section 311 BNSS provides a structured and flexible approach to recording witness evidence in a Court of Session. By mandating that the evidence be taken down in writing—whether as a continuous narrative or in a question-and-answer format—and requiring the presiding Judge’s certification, this provision ensures that the testimony is accurately documented and preserved as an essential part of the judicial record. This process is fundamental to maintaining transparency and fairness in the legal system. For further legal insights and detailed guidance on evidentiary procedures, visit ApniLaw.

Contents
Code: Section 311 BNSSExplanation of Section 311 BNSSIllustrationExample 1: Narrative Recording in a Criminal TrialExample 2: Question-and-Answer FormatCommon Questions and Answers on Section 311 BNSS1. Who is responsible for taking down a witness’s evidence in a Court of Session?2. In what form is the evidence usually recorded?3. What ensures the authenticity of the recorded evidence?4. Can the format of the recorded evidence be changed at the Judge’s discretion?Conclusion

You Might Also Like

Section 216 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure For Witnesses In Case Of Threatening, Etc.

Section 41 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Arrest By Magistrate.

Section 33 CrPC: Powers of Appointed Officers – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 231 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Supply Of Copies Of Statements And Documents To Accused In Other Cases Triable By

Section 287 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Judgment In Cases Tried Summarily.

TAGGED:Court of SessionCourt RecordCourtroom PracticesEvidenceLawLegal ProcedureNarrative EvidencePresiding JudgeQuestion and AnswerScotlandTrial ProcedureWitness Examination
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 310 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Record In Warrant-Cases Section 310 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Warrant-Cases.
Next Article Section 322 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Parties May Examine Witnesses Section 322 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Parties May Examine Witnesses.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women
Calcutta High CourtNewsPOCSO & Sexual Crimes

Calcutta HC Takes Up Pleas for Independent Probe in Law College Rape Case Amid SIT Investigation

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
6 days ago
Transgender Woman Can File IPC 498A Complaint, Andhra Pradesh High Court
Supreme Court Receives Appeal Against Allahabad High Court’s Ruling Invalidating Uttar Pradesh Madarsa Act
Irregular Demarcation Report Requires Fresh Commission, Not Entire Suit Remand for Land Dispute: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Supreme Court Seeks Compliance from Ajit Pawar Group in NCP Rift Over ‘Clock’ Symbol
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?