By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 308 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 308 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused.
BNSS

Section 308 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 18, 2025 4:22 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 308 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused
Section 308 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Evidence To Be Taken In Presence Of Accused
SHARE

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Section 308

Code: Section 308 BNSS

308.
Except as otherwise expressly provided, all evidence taken in the course of the trial or other proceeding shall be taken in the presence of the accused, or, when his personal attendance is dispensed with, in the presence of his pleader:
Provided that where the evidence of a woman below the age of eighteen years who is alleged to have been subjected to rape or any other sexual offence, is to be recorded, the court may take appropriate measures to ensure that such woman is not confronted by the accused while at the same time ensuring the right of cross-examination of the accused.
Explanation.— In this section, “accused” includes a person in relation to whom any proceeding under Chapter IX has been commenced under this Sanhita.


Explanation of Section 308 BNSS

Section 308 BNSS establishes the fundamental requirement that evidence in a trial or proceeding must be taken in the presence of the accused, or if the accused is not present, in the presence of his legal representative (pleader). This principle is key to safeguarding the right of the accused to confront the evidence and witnesses against him.

Key Points:

  • Presence of the Accused or Pleader:
    The default position is that all evidence must be recorded with the accused present in court. If the accused is not personally present—whether by waiver or other dispensation—the evidence should be recorded in the presence of his pleader to ensure that his interests are represented.
  • Special Provisions for Minors in Sexual Offence Cases:
    The section provides a specific safeguard for cases involving a woman below the age of eighteen who is alleged to have been subjected to rape or another sexual offence. In such cases, the Court is empowered to take measures to ensure that the young woman is not forced into direct confrontation with the accused. This is balanced by the requirement to preserve the accused’s right to cross-examine, ensuring that the principles of fairness and justice are maintained.
  • Inclusive Definition of “Accused”:
    The explanation clarifies that the term “accused” extends to any person against whom a proceeding under Chapter IX has been initiated under this Sanhita, thus covering a broad range of criminal proceedings.

Illustration

Example 1: Standard Trial Scenario

In a criminal trial, a witness is examined in the presence of the accused. This ensures that the accused has the opportunity to observe the testimony, which is essential for his right to confront and cross-examine the witness. If for any reason the accused’s presence is dispensed with, his pleader is present to safeguard his interests.

Example 2: Protection of a Minor Witness in a Sexual Offence Case

In a case involving allegations of rape against a minor girl (below eighteen years), the Court, while ensuring that the witness’s testimony is properly recorded, takes additional measures such as using a separate room or video link. These measures protect the minor from direct confrontation with the accused, while still allowing the accused to exercise his right to cross-examine her testimony indirectly.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 308 BNSS

1. Why must evidence be taken in the presence of the accused?

  • Answer:
    Taking evidence in the presence of the accused is crucial for upholding his right to confront the witnesses and challenge the evidence against him, thereby ensuring a fair trial.

2. What happens if the accused is not present in court?

  • Answer:
    If the accused is not present, his pleader must be present during the recording of evidence. This ensures that the accused’s interests are represented and that he does not lose the opportunity for cross-examination.

3. What special measures can be taken when a minor is a witness in a sexual offence case?

  • Answer:
    The Court may adopt appropriate measures—such as recording the testimony in a separate room or via video conferencing—to ensure that the minor witness is not directly confronted by the accused while still preserving the accused’s right to cross-examine her indirectly.

4. How is “accused” defined under this section?

  • Answer:
    For the purposes of this section, “accused” includes any person in relation to whom any proceeding under Chapter IX of the Sanhita has been commenced.

Conclusion

Section 308 BNSS ensures that the fundamental right of the accused to be present during the taking of evidence is maintained throughout the judicial process, or alternatively, that his interests are safeguarded through the presence of his pleader. Moreover, it provides necessary protective measures for minor witnesses in sexual offence cases to prevent direct confrontation with the accused, while still allowing for cross-examination. These provisions work together to uphold fairness and justice in criminal proceedings. For further legal insights and detailed guidance on evidentiary procedures, visit ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 379 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure In Cases Mentioned In Section 215.

Section 144 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Order For Maintenance Of Wives, Children And Parents.

Section 454 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Execution Of Sentence Of Death Passed By High Court.

Section 509 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Non-Compliance With Provisions Of Section 183 Or Section 316.

Section 98 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power To Declare Certain Publications Forfeited And To Issue Search-Warrants For Same.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 300 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Non-Application Of Chapter Section 300 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Non-Application Of Chapter.
Next Article Section 314 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Interpretation Of Evidence To Accused Or His Advocate Section 314 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Interpretation Of Evidence To Accused Or His Advocate.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi High Court
Delhi High CourtFamilyHigh CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Woman’s Right to Shared Household Remains Valid Even In Absence Of Domestic Violence: Delhi High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Supreme Court Orders Husband To Pay Rs. 2 Crores As Alimony
Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
Conviction Invalid If Suicide Attempt Occurred in Same Period: Kerala HC
Outraging Woman’s Modesty Includes Physical and Verbal Acts: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?