By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 25 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Sentence In Cases Of Conviction Of Several Offences At One Trial
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 25 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Sentence In Cases Of Conviction Of Several Offences At One Trial
BNSS

Section 25 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Sentence In Cases Of Conviction Of Several Offences At One Trial

Apni Law
Last updated: March 11, 2025 12:40 am
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Section 25 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Sentence In Cases Of Conviction Of Several Offences At One Trial
Section 25 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Sentence In Cases Of Conviction Of Several Offences At One Trial
SHARE

 Code:

(1) When a person is convicted at one trial of two or more offences, the Court may,
subject to the provisions of section 9 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sentence him for such offences, to the several punishments prescribed therefor which such Court is competent to inflict and the Court shall, considering the gravity of offences, order such
punishments to run concurrently or consecutively.

Contents
 Code:Explanation of the SectionIllustrationExample 1: Concurrent SentencesExample 2: Consecutive Sentences with Aggregate LimitationExample 3: Aggregate Sentence for AppealCommon Questions and Answers1. What happens if the aggregate punishment exceeds the allowable sentence for a single offence?2. Can a person serve more than 20 years of imprisonment for multiple convictions?3. How does the aggregate sentence work for appeal purposes?Conclusion

(2) In the case of consecutive sentences, it shall not be necessary for the Court by
reason only of the aggregate punishment for the several offences being in excess of the punishment which it is competent to inflict on conviction of a single offence, to send the offender for trial before a higher Court:

Provided that—
(a) in no case shall such person be sentenced to imprisonment for a longer
period than twenty years;

(b) the aggregate punishment shall not exceed twice the amount of punishment
which the Court is competent to inflict for a single offence.

(3) For the purpose of appeal by a convicted person, the aggregate of the consecutive
sentences passed against him under this section shall be deemed to be a single sentence.

Explanation of the Section

This section addresses the situation when a person is convicted of multiple offences in a single trial. It lays down the rules for how sentences should be handled in such cases:

  1. Multiple Offences and Sentencing (Sub-section 1):

    • When a person is convicted of two or more offences, the Court has the discretion to impose the corresponding punishments for each offence.
    • The Court must decide whether these sentences will run concurrently (at the same time) or consecutively (one after the other), depending on the seriousness of the offences.
  2. Consecutive Sentences (Sub-section 2):

    • Even if the aggregate punishment for multiple offences exceeds the punishment the Court is allowed to give for a single offence, the offender does not need to be tried in a higher court.
    • However, there are limits:
      • Maximum Sentence: The total period of imprisonment cannot exceed 20 years.
      • Punishment Limit: The total punishment for multiple offences cannot be more than twice the maximum punishment the Court can impose for a single offence.
  3. Appeals (Sub-section 3):

    • When an individual appeals a conviction, if they were sentenced to consecutive sentences for multiple offences, the aggregate of the consecutive sentences is treated as a single sentence for the purpose of appeal.

Illustration

Example 1: Concurrent Sentences

Case: A person is convicted of theft and assault during the same trial. The Court sentences the person to 2 years for theft and 3 years for assault.
Sentence: Since the sentences run concurrently, the individual will serve a total of 3 years in prison, not 5 years.

Example 2: Consecutive Sentences with Aggregate Limitation

Case: A person is convicted of fraud and bribery in the same trial. The Court sentences the individual to 5 years for fraud and 7 years for bribery, with sentences to run consecutively.
Sentence: The total aggregate punishment would be 12 years, which is within the allowable limits because it is less than twice the punishment the Court can impose for a single offence.

Example 3: Aggregate Sentence for Appeal

Case: A person is sentenced to 4 years for robbery and 6 years for assault, with the sentences to run consecutively. The total aggregate sentence for appeal purposes would be 10 years, treated as a single sentence for the appeal process.


Common Questions and Answers

1. What happens if the aggregate punishment exceeds the allowable sentence for a single offence?

  • Answer: The Court does not need to refer the case to a higher Court. However, the total imprisonment cannot exceed 20 years, and the total punishment for all offences combined cannot exceed twice the punishment for a single offence.

2. Can a person serve more than 20 years of imprisonment for multiple convictions?

  • Answer: No. The total imprisonment for multiple offences cannot exceed 20 years, even if the aggregate punishment for the offences would exceed this limit.

3. How does the aggregate sentence work for appeal purposes?

  • Answer: When a convicted person appeals, the aggregate of the consecutive sentences is considered as a single sentence for the purpose of the appeal, making the appeal process simpler and more streamlined.

Conclusion

Section 25 provides clarity on how multiple sentences are handled when a person is convicted of more than one offence in a single trial. It ensures that punishments can be combined but with certain limits to prevent excessively long sentences. The aggregate sentence is treated as a single sentence for appeal purposes, ensuring that the process is manageable and fair for the convicted individual.

You Might Also Like

Section 104 IPC: Right to Cause Harm Other Than Death

Section 350 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Expenses Of Complainants And Witnesses.

Section 28 – Hindu Marriage Act – Appeals From Decrees And Orders.

How To Apply For A Voter ID Card Correction

IPC Section 101: Right to Cause Harm Other Than Death

TAGGED:Aggregate PunishmentAppealBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023BNSSConcurrent SentencesConsecutive SentencesConvictionCourtCriminal JusticeCriminal Justice SystemCriminal LawCriminal Law ReformCriminal ProcedureIndiaIndian LawIndian legal systemJudicial DiscretionJudicial ProcedureJurisprudenceLawLaw EnforcementLaw of IndiaLaw StudentLegal AnalysisLegal InterpretationLegal PractitionerLegal ProfessionalLegal ResearchLegal StudiesLegal SystemLegislationMaximum SentenceOffencesPunishmentSection25SentencingStatutory InterpretationTrial
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 20 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Directorate Of Prosecution Section 20 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Directorate Of Prosecution
Next Article CrPC Section 443: Power to Order Sufficient Bail When Initial Bail is Insufficient
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Kerala High Court Amends Selection Rules For Civil Judge Appointments
CriminalKerala High CourtNews

Not Informing Grounds of Arrest Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 22: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 weeks ago
Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists’ Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against ‘Malayala Manorama
Supreme Court Directs Uttarakhand To Decide On Patanjali’s Ayurvedic Products Within Two Weeks
Section 52A Of NDPS, Non-Compliance Not Always Fatal: Supreme Court Ruling
Arbitral Award Is Void When Specific Dispute Alone Is Referred: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

How To File A Case Under The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002?

Frozen Bank Account? Legal Remedies You Must Know in India (2025 Guide)

Women in Distress

Section 2 of Indecent Representation of Women Act: Key Definitions and Legal Meaning

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?