By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Family > Alimony & Maintenance > Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court
Alimony & MaintenanceJharkhand High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 9, 2025 1:41 am
Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Share
Right to Maintenance For Women
Right to Maintenance For Women
SHARE

The Jharkhand High Court has ruled that a widowed daughter-in-law and her minor children can claim maintenance from her father-in-law and brother-in-law under Sections 19 and 22 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA). The Court held that the widow is unable to maintain herself. The in-laws possess unpartitioned coparcenary property, she is entitled to maintenance. A division bench of Justices Sujit Narayan Prasad and Rajesh Kumar dismissed an appeal by the in-laws challenging a family court order. It directed them to pay ₹3,000 per month to the widow and ₹1,000 each to her two children. The Court noted that the widow had been turned out of her matrimonial home and had no source of income. It found that the in-laws continued to hold joint agricultural land, which included her late husband’s share.

The Court rejected the in-laws’ arguments about their inability to pay. They clarified that the widow had met all statutory requirements under HAMA. It affirmed that she could not seek help from her own parents due to their financial condition. Thus, the High Court upheld the family court’s maintenance order.

You Might Also Like

Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea For Virtual Campaigning By Arrested Leaders

Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act Only Covers Protection Orders, Not Maintenance: Himachal Pradesh HC

Foreign Nationality Not a Ground to Deny Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi HC

Woman Inducing Minor Boy’ Falls Under POCSO: Karnataka High Court Affirms Gender Neutrality of Act

TAGGED:Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance ActHindu Women RightsJharkhand High CourtMaintenanceWomen
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Kerala Inducing Sexual Intercourse Under False Promise of Marriage Not Applicable For Married Women Under BNS Section 69 and 84: Kerala HC
Next Article How To Be A Witness Of A Marriage Registration Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court
4 Comments
  • Pingback: Important Supreme Court Judgements That Interpret Indian Contract Law - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Consent and Free Consent under Indian Contract Law (Section 13-19) - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Performance Of Contracts: What If One Party Fails - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: BNSS Section 210: Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief To YouTuber Savukku Shankar, Urges Madras HC To Expedite Habeas Corpus Petition
News

Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief To YouTuber Savukku Shankar, Urges Madras HC To Expedite Habeas Corpus Petition

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 year ago
No Death Penalty If Reform Potential Exists, Even in Multiple Murder Cases: Supreme Court
No Need for Equivalency Certificate for IGNOU Degree: Kerala HC
Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act
Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Social Media Content Identifying Raped And Murdered Trainee Doctor
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?