By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: No Maintenance for Educated Wife Choosing Unemployment: Delhi HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Alimony & Maintenance > No Maintenance for Educated Wife Choosing Unemployment: Delhi HC
Alimony & MaintenanceDelhi High CourtNews

No Maintenance for Educated Wife Choosing Unemployment: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 29, 2025 12:19 am
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Right to Maintenance For Women
Right to Maintenance For Women
SHARE

Contents
IntroductionCase BackgroundPetitioner’s StanceCourt’s RulingFinal Verdict

Introduction


The Delhi High Court ruled that a well-educated wife with prior job experience cannot remain unemployed just to claim maintenance. The court dismissed the wife’s plea for interim maintenance under Section 125 of CrPC, emphasizing that she had the capacity to earn.

Case Background


The couple married in 2019 and moved to Singapore. The wife returned to India in February 2021, alleging cruelty by her husband and in-laws. She claimed her husband revoked her spousal visa, leaving her stranded in Singapore. She also alleged that he kept her valuables, forcing her to sell jewelry to fund her return. Due to financial struggles, she moved in with her maternal uncle.

She argued that although she had a master’s degree and prior work experience in Dubai (2005–2007), she had not been employed since. She claimed the family court ignored the long gap between her last job and marriage, proving her financial dependence.

Petitioner’s Stance


The wife contended that she had no financial means and demanded ₹3,25,000 as monthly maintenance. She argued that her lack of employment was not intentional and that the family court failed to consider her circumstances.

Court’s Ruling


The husband opposed the plea, asserting that the wife was highly educated and capable of earning. He argued that she exaggerated his financial status while downplaying her own earning potential. The court noted that she was an able-bodied, qualified individual who had deliberately remained unemployed to claim maintenance.

A key factor in the ruling was a WhatsApp conversation between the wife and her mother. The messages suggested a deliberate strategy to stay unemployed for a higher alimony claim. The court found this evidence crucial in determining her intent.

Final Verdict


The court denied interim maintenance, stating that educated wives with the ability to work should not misuse legal provisions. It urged the wife to seek employment instead of relying on maintenance. The judgment reinforced the principle that maintenance is for those genuinely in need, not those who choose to remain idle.

You Might Also Like

Second Wife Not Liable Under Section 494 IPC in Bigamy Case: Chhattisgarh High Court

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

Liquor Policy Case: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal Moves Supreme Court Against ED Arrest

NDPS Act Search & Seizure Provisions in Landmark Judgment

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Constitutional Provisions, Imposes Rs. 10,000 Fine

TAGGED:Delhi High CourtDivorceEducationMaintenanceMarriage Act
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Grabbing Breasts And Dragging Amount To Aggravated Sexual Assault And Not Attempted Rape Grabbing Breasts And Dragging Amount To Aggravated Sexual Assault And Not Attempted Rape: Allahabad HC
Next Article Cross Examination of the Witness Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Murder Attempt case
News

Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 year ago
Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments
Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11
Supreme Court Issues Notice On PIL For Online Access To Digitised Judicial Records
DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?