By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: A Girlfriend Cannot Be Treated “Relative” Under IPC Section 498A: Gujarat HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Gujarat High Court > A Girlfriend Cannot Be Treated “Relative” Under IPC Section 498A: Gujarat HC
FamilyGujarat High CourtNews

A Girlfriend Cannot Be Treated “Relative” Under IPC Section 498A: Gujarat HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 22, 2025 3:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Share
High Court of Gujarat
High Court of Gujarat
SHARE

The Gujarat High Court quashed a cruelty FIR against a woman accused of being the girlfriend of a married man. The Court held that complainants cannot treat a husband’s girlfriend as a “relative” under IPC Section 498A.

Contents
Woman Cannot Be Treated as Relative Under IPC 498ANo Familial Link Between Petitioner and HusbandAllegations in FIR Focused Only on AffairCourt Cites Supreme Court PrecedentNo Evidence Supporting Other ChargesGujarat High Court Quashes FIR


Woman Cannot Be Treated as Relative Under IPC 498A


The petitioner argued that she was only in a relationship with the complainant’s husband. She pointed out that no other accusations were made against her. Justice J.C. Doshi agreed, stating no legal relationship existed between the petitioner and the husband.


No Familial Link Between Petitioner and Husband


The Court observed that the petitioner was merely the husband’s girlfriend. It found no evidence proving any familial connection. The Additional Public Prosecutor also failed to establish any such relationship.


Allegations in FIR Focused Only on Affair


According to the FIR, the complainant’s husband admitted the affair and threatened to kill his wife if she refused to divorce him. The FIR also alleged that the petitioner visited the complainant’s home, spoke abusively, and caused mental and physical harassment.


Court Cites Supreme Court Precedent


Justice Doshi referred to the Supreme Court ruling in Dechamma I.M. @ Dechamma Koushik v. State of Karnataka (2024). The Supreme Court clearly held that a girlfriend or a woman in a romantic relationship outside marriage is not a “relative” under IPC Section 498A.


No Evidence Supporting Other Charges


The Court also noted the absence of evidence for offenses under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506(2). It found that the FIR and charge sheet lacked essential elements to support these charges.


Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR


Considering the lack of evidence and legal basis, the Gujarat High Court quashed the FIR. It ruled that forcing the petitioner to face trial would be unjustified.

You Might Also Like

Kerala High Court Amends Selection Rules For Civil Judge Appointments

Divorce For Different Personal Laws And Latest Regulations

Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination

Supreme Court Denies Pension Claims Of UP Roadways Employees Under Provident Fund Scheme

Chief Justice Of India Inaugurates Vigentennial Celebrations Of Madurai Bench Of Madras Court

TAGGED:AdulteryComplainantDivorcedomestic violenceFIRGujarat High CourtIPC 498Ipc 498Amental cruelty
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Indian Military What Is Military Rule Under Indian Law and the Constitution
Next Article Section 37 - The Specific Relief Act - Temporary And Perpetual Injunctions Section 37 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Temporary And Perpetual Injunctions.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Madhya Pradesh
FamilyHigh CourtMadhya Pradesh High CourtMarriage and DivorceNews

Denial of Education Amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court Grants Divorce

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act Only Covers Protection Orders, Not Maintenance: Himachal Pradesh HC
Women’s Safety in Public Spaces Must Be Ensured Through Right To Live And Move Freely: Delhi High Court
Right to Voluntarily Close Business Under Article 19(1)(g): SC
Pension As Hard Earned Benefit Can’t Be Recovered Without Due Process: Chhattisgarh HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?