By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Orders Survey of Karnataka Mines for Rehabilitation Plans
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Orders Survey of Karnataka Mines for Rehabilitation Plans
NewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Survey of Karnataka Mines for Rehabilitation Plans

Apni Law
Last updated: December 27, 2024 1:09 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

In a significant development concerning iron ore mining in Karnataka, the Supreme Court has issued directives for a comprehensive survey of Category A/B/C mines in Bellary, Chitradurga, and Tumkur districts. The survey aims to assess the absence of rehabilitation and reclamation (R&R) plans, ensuring environmental conservation and sustainable mining practices.

The Bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, MM Sundresh, and Bela M Trivedi instructed the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF), Karnataka, to conduct a detailed scrutiny of the identified mines. The court emphasized the implementation of R&R Plans either through Karnataka Mining and Environment Restoration Corporation (KMERC) or other suitable agencies.

Additionally, the Centrally Empowered Committee (CEC), along with the Monitoring Committee and Oversight Authority, has been tasked with conducting a comprehensive exercise in the three districts and submitting a detailed report within four months. The report will consider parameters outlined in previous assessments and may involve satellite mappings/images to monitor mining activities effectively.

The Supreme Court’s intervention stems from a public interest litigation (PIL). Samaj Parivartana Samudhaya filed, highlighting illegal mining activities and environmental degradation in the region. Following temporary bans and subsequent relaxations, the court imposed production ceilings. This is to regulate iron ore extraction in Bellary, Chitradurga, and Tumkur districts.

The recent directive underscores the court’s commitment to environmental preservation and sustainable mining practices in Karnataka. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to R&R guidelines and ensuring accountability in the mining sector.

Stay informed about legal proceedings and environmental issues with ApniLaw.

Case Title: SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA AND ORS. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS, W.P.(C) No. 562/2009

Click here to read the order

You Might Also Like

Pension As Hard Earned Benefit Can’t Be Recovered Without Due Process: Chhattisgarh HC

RTI Act Cannot Be Used to Harass Employees: Punjab and Haryana HC

Chief Justice Of India Inaugurates Vigentennial Celebrations Of Madurai Bench Of Madras Court

Excluding Legal Heir Without Reasons Can Be Overturned: Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Woman Can Claim Maintenance from Second Husband Even If First Marriage Was Not Legally Dissolved: Supreme Court

TAGGED:environmental conservationKarnataka mineslegal proceedingsrehabilitation plansSupreme Courtsustainable mining practices References: Supreme Court orders
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Gujarat High Court Upholds MBBS Admission Cancellation Despite Eligibility in General Category Gujarat High Court Upholds MBBS Admission Cancellation Despite Eligibility in General Category
Next Article Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POCSO Act Save Children
CriminalFamilyHigh CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Must Avoid Recording The Full Name and Address Of POCSO Victims: J&K High Court Orders Immediate Redaction of Rape Victim’s Name

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Statements Under Section 161 And 164 CrPC Only Considered In Rare Cases: Karnataka High Court
Convicts of Heinous Crimes Still Entitled to Basic Legal Protections: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence Due to Unfair Trial
Forcing Spouse to Convert is Cruelty: Madras High Court
Pending FIR Not A Bar For Passport Renewal: Jammu And Kashmir High Court Rules On Passport Issuance Amid Pending Investigations
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?