By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Orders NTA To Publish NEET-UG 2024 Marks With Student Identities Masked
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Orders NTA To Publish NEET-UG 2024 Marks With Student Identities Masked
News

Supreme Court Orders NTA To Publish NEET-UG 2024 Marks With Student Identities Masked

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 26, 2024 1:03 am
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Orders NTA To Publish NEET-UG 2024 Marks With Student Identities Masked
Supreme Court Orders NTA To Publish NEET-UG 2024 Marks With Student Identities Masked
SHARE

On Thursday, the Supreme Court mandated the National Testing Agency (NTA) to release the marks of all students who took the NEET-UG 2024 exam. The results must be posted on the NTA’s website, sorted by city and centre, with student identities masked. This directive comes in response to a series of petitions calling for the cancellation of the NEET-UG 2024 exam due to allegations of a paper leak and malpractice.

The Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and including Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, gave the NTA until Saturday noon to complete this task. The court scheduled the next hearing for Monday.

Petitioners had argued that the NTA had not published complete results, making it difficult to verify the center-wise marking patterns. Senior Advocate Narender Hooda, represented the lead petitioners. He emphasised that the candidates were disadvantaged. They had no access to the CBI status report or comprehensive exam results.

In light of these arguments, the bench ordered, “The petitioners have argued for greater transparency by publishing the NEET-UG 2024 results, detailing marks by centre and city while ensuring student identities are masked.”

During trial

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed the publication of center-wise results, citing privacy concerns. However, Chief Justice Chandrachud highlighted the necessity of analysing the complete data. This is to determine if the paper leak, confirmed in Patna and Hazaribagh centres, had affected other locations as well. The Court suggested using dummy roll numbers to protect student identities.

Initially, the Court directed the NTA to publish the results by Friday 5 PM. But Senior Advocate Naresh Kaushik, representing the NTA, requested more time to process the results of over 2.3 million students. Consequently, the deadline was extended to Saturday.

During the day-long hearing, the Court raised significant questions. They made key observations, underscoring the importance of transparency and data analysis. It was in addressing the alleged exam irregularities.

You Might Also Like

Plea Against MM Lawrence’s Body Donation For Medical Research Rejected By Supreme Court

Motor Accident Claims / Compensation Can’t Be Reduced Merely Because Dependents Took Over Business Of Deceased : Supreme Court

RTI Act Cannot Be Used to Harass Employees: Punjab and Haryana HC

Supreme Court Rules Out Entertainment Tax On Internet Service For Cinema Ticket Bookings

Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity, Rules On UP Education Officials' Pay Scales Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity, Rules On UP Education Officials’ Pay Scales
Next Article Supreme Court To Review Alleged Flaws In Punjab & Haryana Judicial Service Exam Supreme Court To Review Alleged Flaws In Punjab & Haryana Judicial Service Exam
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
IPCNewsSupreme Court

Bodily Injuries Are Not Essential to Prove Sexual Assault: Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Convicts of Heinous Crimes Still Entitled to Basic Legal Protections: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence Due to Unfair Trial
No Death Penalty If Reform Potential Exists, Even in Multiple Murder Cases: Supreme Court
Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC
What Are The Legal Provisions for Freezing Bank Accounts in Cybercrime Cases in India
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?