By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Criminal > Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification
CriminalDocumentationNewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 29, 2025 9:48 am
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

The Supreme Court has criticized the frequent and mechanical use of Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. by magistrates to order police investigations. It emphasized that magistrates must exercise judicial discretion instead of acting as a mere post office. Any order directing an FIR must be based on necessity and not issued automatically.

Contents
Magistrates Must Assess Whether Police Investigation is NeededKey Changes Under BNSS 2023 Strengthen SafeguardsConclusion


Magistrates Must Assess Whether Police Investigation is Needed


The Court clarified that magistrates should only order a police investigation when it is genuinely required. If a complaint involves straightforward allegations that the court can directly try, the magistrate should proceed with recording evidence rather than directing an FIR. However, if the case is complex and requires police expertise, only then should an investigation be ordered.
In this case, an advocate accused a police officer of assault and humiliation. When the police refused to register his complaint, he approached the magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., who directed the police to file an FIR. The Supreme Court ruled that the allegations did not justify an FIR and criticized the magistrate for failing to assess whether police intervention was necessary.


Key Changes Under BNSS 2023 Strengthen Safeguards


The Court also highlighted important reforms introduced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which add safeguards to prevent misuse of Section 156(3). These changes ensure that FIR registration follows a structured and justified process.
First, complainants must now apply to the Superintendent of Police before approaching the magistrate. This application must include an affidavit. Second, magistrates now have the authority to conduct an independent inquiry before ordering an FIR. Third, magistrates must consider the reasons provided by the police for refusing to register an FIR before issuing any direction.


Conclusion


The Supreme Court ruled that magistrates must not order FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. without proper justification. The judgment reinforces the need for judicial discretion and prevents the misuse of legal provisions for unnecessary FIRs.

You Might Also Like

The Binding Nature And Challenges Of Judicial Precedents In India

Separation Before Divorce Agreement Counts for Mutual Divorce: Allahabad HC

Freezing Bank Account Under Section 102 CrPC During Investigation Into Offences Under Prevention of Corruption Act Legally Valid: Kerala HC

Understanding The Mechanics Of Cheques

Cheque Will Be Invalid Due To Single Signature On Joint Account: Punjab & Haryana High Court

TAGGED:Complaint FilingCourt OrderCrPC 153JustificationSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To Register For GST? How to Apply for GST Registration in India?
Next Article Supreme Court of India What Is the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Non-Bailable Warrants In The Sharif Ahmed Case?
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
NDPS Act
High CourtNewsTelangana High Court

Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Mother Cannot Mask Paternity Even When Addicted To Vices In Child’s Birth Record: Bombay HC
Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC
Madhya Pradesh High Court: Husband Cannot Refuse Maintenance to Wife Based Solely on Modern Lifestyle
Police Must Uphold Human Dignity While Maintaining Law, Says Madras High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Allahabad High Court

Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC

Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case, Orders Rs. 28.5 Lakh Fine

What Is Presumption of Debt in Cheque Cases: Section 139 of Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?