By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
News

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 21, 2024 7:37 pm
Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
SHARE

New Delhi, September 9: The Supreme Court dismissed a special leave petition (SLP) today. It imposed a cost of ₹10,000 on the petitioner for attempting to seek remission by suppressing facts. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih, reprimanded the petitioner for making false statements and producing misleading documents in the case.

The accused, who was convicted under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He was sentenced to life imprisonment, sought parole due to a family medical emergency. His plea for parole was rejected on February 28. He had already been in custody for 14 years without remission. Moreover, he was rearrested in 2020 under the Arms Act after being granted emergency parole.

During the hearing, the Supreme Court noted several discrepancies in the petitioner’s plea. Specifically, the petitioner falsely claimed that a Miscellaneous Application (M.A.) filed in the Delhi High Court. He has been seeking interim relief had been dismissed. However, upon review, it was revealed that the M.A. had actually been withdrawn by the petitioner. 

Justice Oka, expressing concern over repeated cases of false statements in remission pleas, remarked, “In six cases recently, we have noticed false statements being made for permanent remission.”

The petitioner’s advocate attempted to clarify that the M.A. was “dismissed as withdrawn,” but the court rejected this explanation. Justice Oka further noted that misleading information had been provided not just in the synopsis but also in the grounds of the petition, which attempted to project the High Court’s order as an arbitrary denial of judicial discretion.

As a result, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner had deliberately suppressed facts and misrepresented the High Court’s proceedings. The court ordered the petitioner to pay ₹10,000 to the Delhi Legal Services Authority within one month.

You Might Also Like

Only Family Court Can Decide Marital Status Disputes: Orissa HC

Supreme Court, Specific Relief Act, Contract Law, Legal News, Execution Proceedings, Justice JB Pardiwala, Justice Manoj Misra

Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings

Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute

Child’s Education Should Not Be Disrupted Due To Parental Dispute: Madras High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Minor in the U.S.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To Get A Copy Of A Land Record (Jamabandi) How To Get A Copy Of A Land Record (Jamabandi)
Next Article Supreme Court Acquits Husband And In-Laws In Dowry Death Case: Supreme Court Dowry Death Judgement Supreme Court Acquits Husband And In-Laws In Dowry Death Case: Supreme Court Dowry Death Judgement
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Cannot Misuse Press Freedom To Defame A Person Without ...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi High Court case
Delhi High CourtHigh CourtNewsWomen Rights

Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private Videos: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Union Government Over Blood Donation Guidelines For Gay Men
Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing On Haryana’s Plea Against High Court’s Shambhu Border Unblock Order
Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings
Supreme Court Criticises Low Conviction Rate In Money Laundering Cases, Urges ED To Improve Prosecution Quality
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?