By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts
News

Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 21, 2024 8:50 pm
Amna Kabeer
9 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts
Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts
SHARE

The Supreme Court closes 2017 PIL today. It was filed in 2017 concerning the alarming rate of tiger deaths in India. The case was closed after the petitioner had originally brought the issue to the Court’s attention. He expressed satisfaction with the steps taken by the government since the PIL was initiated.

A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar passed the order. They noted that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the PIL. This was given the substantial improvements in tiger conservation efforts. The Court, however, granted the petitioner the liberty to return to either the Supreme Court or the relevant High Court if necessary in the future.

During the hearing, the petitioner represented himself. He stated that he was pleased with the progress made since 2017. He noted, “We are doing better than what we were in 2017, so I am happy.” In response, the bench indicated that it was inclined to bring the case to a close.

Before finalising the order, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati suggested that the bench review the latest statistics on tiger deaths. However, Justice Khanna responded that the bench had already reviewed the data and was satisfied with the progress, acknowledging that “good work has been done.” He also remarked that while improvements had been made, there is always room for further progress.

Background

The PIL, filed in 2017, highlighted the disturbing trend of tiger deaths, citing data from the National Tiger Conservation Authority. The petitioner reported that 41 tigers had been killed in just seven months between January and August 2015, and 74 tiger deaths were recorded in 2016. These deaths were attributed to man-animal conflicts, poaching, and other causes, including alleged involvement of locals and forest authorities.

A significant development in the case came in 2018 when a census reported the presence of 2,967 tigers across 53 tiger reserves in India. However, the issue resurfaced in 2023 when 30 tiger deaths were reported within just two months, prompting the Supreme Court to ask the Central government for updated figures on tiger mortality.

With today’s order, the Supreme Court closes 2017 PIL which has effectively closed a chapter. It is in the ongoing efforts to protect India’s tiger population. We could also leave the door open for future legal recourse should the situation require it.

You Might Also Like

Harassment Must Be Severe Enough With No Choice But To Take Their Own Life: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Husband And In-Laws In Dowry Death Case: Supreme Court Dowry Death Judgement

PC & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act Offences Are Cognizable, FIR Not Barred By Law: Delhi HC

Justice Hima Kohli Advocates for Judicial Collaboration Between India & USA to Drive Economic Development

Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Calcutta High Court Orders Release Of Student Protestor Sayan Lahiri, Criticises Police Action Calcutta High Court Orders Release Of Student Protestor Sayan Lahiri, Criticises Police Action
Next Article Supreme Court of India Supreme Court Imposes Fine On Gujarat Police Officer For Contempt, Accepts Magistrate’s Apology
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Warns Baba Ramdev and Patanjali MD for Contempt, Stresses Respect for Allopathy
NewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Warns Baba Ramdev and Patanjali MD for Contempt, Stresses Respect for Allopathy

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Supreme Court Reaffirms Doctrine of Lis Pendens: Defences of Bona Fide Purchaser and Lack of Notice Not Applicable
Supreme Court Orders Rehabilitation Before Evictions For Haldwani Railway Station Development
Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments
Push For CNAP Caller ID: Supreme Court Seeks Response On PIL
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?