By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
News

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 22, 2024 3:15 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
SHARE

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has made an observation. The mere act of overtaking on the road cannot be deemed as rash or negligent driving. The judgment came from a bench comprising Justices CT Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol. This was while deciding an appeal related to an accident compensation claim under the Motor Vehicles Act.

The case originated from a tragic accident where the appellant, along with his wife, was struck by two tractors while riding a motorcycle. The wife tragically died at the scene, and the husband sustained serious injuries. The couple was engaged in a prosperous business, earning a substantial income.

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal initially awarded the appellant a compensation of Rs. 1,01,250/-, far below the claimed Rs. 12,00,000/-, attributing contributory negligence to the victims due to the act of overtaking. The High Court later revised the compensation slightly, applying a higher multiplier but did not fully address the issue of contributory negligence.

During trial

The Supreme Court, however, overturned the findings of contributory negligence. The bench noted that overtaking is a routine action on roads and cannot be automatically classified as rash or negligent without supporting evidence. The Court pointed out that the accident was caused by a second tractor, which was being driven recklessly and on the wrong side of the road.

Citing precedents like Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Laxman Iyer & Anr. and Pramodkumar Rasikbhai Jhaveri v. Karamasey Kunvargi Tak & Ors., the Court emphasized that contributory negligence applies only when the plaintiff’s actions significantly contribute to the harm suffered. The mere act of overtaking does not meet this standard.

The Supreme Court also addressed the issue of compensation, criticizing the tribunal’s decision to use a multiplier of 9 and instead applying a multiplier of 15. Additionally, the Court factored in future prospects when calculating the final compensation, resulting in a substantial increase to Rs. 11,25,000/- from the originally awarded Rs. 1,01,250/-.

The ruling underscores the Court’s stance. Everyday driving actions like overtaking should not be hastily labeled as rash or negligent. Even  without a thorough examination of the circumstances.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Removes PUC Certificate Requirement For Vehicle Insurance

Supreme Court Rules Legal Heirs Not Liable for Partnership Firm’s Debts After Partner’s Death

Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act

Supreme Court Requires Specific Allegations To Hold Directors Liable For Company Offences Under National Housing Bank Act

Foreign Nationality Not a Ground to Deny Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi HC

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment
Next Article Kerala High Court Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Challenging Kerala HC’s Ruling On Melshanthis Appointment At Sabarimala And Malikappuram Temple
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Rajasthan High Court
News

Supreme Court Overturns Rajasthan High Court Rulings On Departmental Enquiry: Clarifies Limited Role Of Courts In Reassessing Evidence

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
Pending FIR Not A Bar For Passport Renewal: Jammu And Kashmir High Court Rules On Passport Issuance Amid Pending Investigations
Supreme Court Urges Training For Police On Differentiating Cheating From Criminal Breach Of Trust
Supreme Court Stays Madras High Court Order For New Investigation In Thoothukudi Police Firing Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?