By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Protect Ratan Tata’s Name from Unauthorized Use: Delhi HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Protect Ratan Tata’s Name from Unauthorized Use: Delhi HC
Delhi High CourtHigh CourtNews

Protect Ratan Tata’s Name from Unauthorized Use: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 12, 2025 8:59 am
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Ratan Tata
Ratan Tata
SHARE

Protect Ratan Tata’s Name from Unauthorized Use

Contents
Court Recognizes Ratan Tata’s Name as a TrademarkTata Group Seeks DamagesCourt Restrains Unauthorized UseBad Faith and Trademark InfringementConclusion

The Delhi High Court ruled that businesses must not use the late industrialist Ratan Tata’s name without permission. The decision came in response to a petition filed by Tata Group and the Sir Ratan Tata Trust.


Court Recognizes Ratan Tata’s Name as a Trademark


The court observed that Ratan Tata’s name is a “well-known personal name/mark” and must be safeguarded from misuse. The ruling ensures that no third party can exploit his reputation for personal or commercial gain.


Tata Group Seeks Damages


Tata Group and the trust have sought damages of over ₹2 crore, claiming that unauthorized use of Ratan Tata’s name has harmed their reputation. The lawsuit highlights that media outlet Delhi Today Group’s founder, Rajat Srivastava, continued to promote an event using Ratan Tata’s name despite being notified to stop.


Court Restrains Unauthorized Use


The High Court barred Srivastava from using the name “Ratan Tata National Icon Award” or the trademarks “Tata” and “Tata Trusts” for any event. Srivastava agreed to comply, and the court ordered him to provide an official undertaking.


Bad Faith and Trademark Infringement


Justice Mini Pushkarna ruled that Srivastava’s actions were in bad faith. They called them an “egregious infringement” of Tata Group’s legal rights. The court noted that he falsely claimed associations with Tata Trusts and its former chairman. Thus, attempting to gain publicity by misusing Ratan Tata’s name.
This ruling reinforces the legal protection of famous personalities’ names and prevents unauthorized individuals from capitalizing on their legacy.

Conclusion

Businesses can respect Ratan Tata’s name and legacy. Unauthorized use can lead to legal action. The Delhi High Court’s ruling reinforces strict protections. Companies should seek proper permissions before using his name. Protecting well-known figures prevents misuse and maintains trust.

Explore Apnilaw for more on news articles and many more…

You Might Also Like

CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Forcing Students To Travel To Distant Exam Centres Violate Right to Education Under Article 21: Punjab And Haryana HC

Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court

DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC

TAGGED:BusinessDelhi High Courttrademark infringementtrademark protection
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Legal Considerations For NRI Inter-Caste Marriages Caste Status Determined by Birth, Does Not Change With Marriage: J&K High Court
Next Article Supreme Court of India Lapses Weakened The Prosecution’s Case: Supreme Court Acquits Death Row Convict
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Legal Considerations For NRI Inter-Caste Marriages
High CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Caste Status Determined by Birth, Does Not Change With Marriage: J&K High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC
Insurers Cannot Deny Claims for Non-Renewal of State Permit: Supreme Court
Any Authority Could Be Empowered To Issue Certificates For Muslim Marriages : Karnataka Waqf Board To HC
Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Allahabad High Court

Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC

Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case, Orders Rs. 28.5 Lakh Fine

What Is Presumption of Debt in Cheque Cases: Section 139 of Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?