By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Mere Refusal To Marry Not Cheating Without Fraud: Gauhati High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Gauhati High Court > Mere Refusal To Marry Not Cheating Without Fraud: Gauhati High Court
Gauhati High CourtHigh CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Mere Refusal To Marry Not Cheating Without Fraud: Gauhati High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 1, 2025 10:06 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
High Court of Gauhati
High Court of Gauhati
SHARE

Court Overturns Conviction for Cheating in Promise to Marry Case


The Gauhati High Court has set aside a trial court’s conviction under Section 417 IPC, ruling that mere refusal to marry does not constitute cheating unless the prosecution establishes fraud under Section 90 IPC.
Justice Arun Dev Choudhury delivered the judgment while hearing a criminal revision petition challenging a 2010 conviction by the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Morigaon. The trial court had sentenced the accused to one year of imprisonment and a fine of ₹1,000. The Sessions Judge, Morigaon, upheld the conviction in 2012, prompting the accused to approach the High Court.

Contents
Court Overturns Conviction for Cheating in Promise to Marry CaseCase BackgroundArguments by the PartiesProsecution’s StandHigh Court’s ObservationsFinal Judgment


Case Background


The case originated from a complaint filed by a woman who claimed she was in a romantic relationship with the accused from 2004-05. She alleged that he promised marriage, engaged in sexual relations with her, and caused her to become pregnant in 2007.
She further stated that he persuaded her to abort the pregnancy, assuring her that they would marry in the first week of Magh. However, on January 30, 2008, he refused to marry her and asked her to marry someone else instead.


Arguments by the Parties

The defense argued that the prosecution failed to prove deception at the beginning of the relationship. Since the complainant was a consenting adult in a long-term relationship, her consent to physical relations was not induced by fraud.
The petitioner’s counsel emphasized that there was no proof that the accused never intended to marry her when the relationship began.


Prosecution’s Stand


The prosecution argued that the accused had falsely promised marriage to deceive the victim into a sexual relationship. The Amicus Curiae asserted that the victim’s consent was obtained under a misconception of fact, making it invalid.


High Court’s Observations


The court noted that the victim and accused were in a love relationship for over three years. It observed that the victim’s testimony did not prove that her consent was based on fraudulent marriage promises.
The court stated:
The relationship lasted four years before breaking down.
No evidence suggested the accused had no intention to marry from the beginning.
The prosecution failed to establish fraud under Section 90 IPC.


Final Judgment


Since the prosecution could not prove deception beyond a reasonable doubt, the High Court acquitted the accused. It overturned the trial court and appellate court’s judgments, ruling that mere refusal to marry does not amount to cheating under Section 417 IPC.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Seeks Compliance from Ajit Pawar Group in NCP Rift Over ‘Clock’ Symbol

Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions

Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s ED Custody Extended in Liquor Policy Scam: Key Updates

Calcutta High Court Stresses Need For Forensic Science Capacity Building For Effective BNSS Implementation

TAGGED:CheatingFraudGauhati Supreme CourtMarriageRelationship
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India SC or ST Act: Caste Abuse Must Occur In Public View To Be An Offense, Rules Supreme Court
Next Article Supreme Court of India SC/ST Act: Intellectual Property Loss Compensation Upheld by Supreme Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Kerala HC
Cyber CrimeHigh CourtKerala High CourtNews

Freezing Bank Account Under Section 102 CrPC During Investigation Into Offences Under Prevention of Corruption Act Legally Valid: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Accused Cannot Be Forced to Seek Case Documents via RTI: Karnataka HC
ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court Criticises Delhi Government’s Freebie Policies After Rajendra Nagar Flooding Tragedy
Push For CNAP Caller ID: Supreme Court Seeks Response On PIL
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?