By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Maternity Leave Counts Towards Bond Period for Doctors, Madras High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Madras High Court > Maternity Leave Counts Towards Bond Period for Doctors, Madras High Court
ActsMadras High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Maternity Leave Counts Towards Bond Period for Doctors, Madras High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 30, 2025 6:16 pm
Amna Kabeer
7 hours ago
Share
Empowering Mothers Through The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
Empowering Mothers Through The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
SHARE

The Madras High Court has ruled that maternity leave availed by a doctor during mandatory government service must be counted toward the bond period. The bench, comprising Justices GR Swaminathan and K Rajasekar, emphasized that maternity leave is a vital part of maternity benefits. It is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court heard the case of complainant, who joined Thittakudi Government Hospital in 2019 after completing her MS in General Surgery. As per her bond, she was required to serve the Tamil Nadu government for two years. After serving for 12 months, she took maternity leave. Authorities then refused to return her original certificates, stating she had not completed her bond term.

The High Court ruled that the bond conditions must align with the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The reproductive rights take precedence. It held that the doctor, though not a regular employee, deserved equal treatment. The court directed the government to return her certificates within four weeks. Thus ,reinforcing that fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 apply equally to bonded service doctors.

You Might Also Like

Life Sentence Of Anu Shanthi In Attingal Double Murder Case Suspended By Supreme Court

Child’s Education Should Not Be Disrupted Due To Parental Dispute: Madras High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Minor in the U.S.

Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges

Delay in Reporting POCSO Offence Not a Crime: Delhi HC

Supreme Court Permits NGT Pune To Form Virtual Bench Due To Member’s Health Issues

TAGGED:Bond timeGovernment EmployeeGovernment HospitalsincomeMadras high courtMaternity benefit
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Kerala Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court
Next Article All About The Enemy Property Act Caretaker Has No Ownership Rights: Karnataka High Court Reiterates Property Possession Rule
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Calcutta HC Takes Up Pleas for Independent Probe in Law College Rape Case Amid SIT Investigation - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
IPC Section 498A: Cruelty By Husband Or Husband's Relatives
High CourtMadras High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Forcing Spouse to Convert is Cruelty: Madras High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Reaffirms Doctrine of Lis Pendens: Defences of Bona Fide Purchaser and Lack of Notice Not Applicable
Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises
Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court’s Decision To Extend Payment Time In Contract Case
Supreme Court Directs NMC to Provide Stipend Details for MBBS Interns Across States
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Who Is Eligible for Free Legal Aid Under the Legal Services Authorities Act? (Section 12)

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Calcutta HC Takes Up Pleas for Independent Probe in Law College Rape Case Amid SIT Investigation

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?