By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Family > Marriage and Divorce > Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
FamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 30, 2025 9:49 pm
Amna Kabeer
7 months ago
Share
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
SHARE

Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents


The Kerala High Court ruled that an employee cannot deny or decide who receives the family pension after their death. The Court held that family pension is not the employee’s property and cannot be disposed of through a will or nomination.

Contents
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or DependentsFamily Pension is Not Part of Employee’s EstateCase of Gopalakrishna PillaiHigh Court Upholds Tribunal’s DecisionFamily Pension Does Not Require a Succession CertificateFinal Verdict


Family Pension is Not Part of Employee’s Estate


A Division Bench of Justice Amit Rawal and Justice K. V. Jayakumar stated that family pension is different from other pensionary benefits like gratuity or provident fund. Employees cannot exclude their legally wedded spouse or dependents from receiving it. They also cannot nominate another person to receive the pension.


Case of Gopalakrishna Pillai


The case involved Gopalakrishna Pillai, a retired Postal Assistant, who excluded his wife and daughter from his service records. He later claimed he had divorced his wife and canceled their nomination for pensionary benefits.
After his death, his wife approached the Central Administrative Tribunal for family pension. The Tribunal ruled in her favor and directed the Union of India to pay her the pension until her death or remarriage. The Union of India challenged this decision in the Kerala High Court.


High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Decision


The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order, stating that an employee has no authority to dictate the disposal of family pension. The Court referred to Supreme Court judgments, including:
Jodh Singh v. Union of India (1980) – Family pension is not part of an employee’s estate since it is not payable during their lifetime.
Violet Issaac & Others v. Union of India (2002) – An employee cannot dispose of family pension through a will.
Nitu v. Sheela Rani & Others (2016) – Reaffirmed that family pension is not part of an estate and cannot be transferred through a testamentary disposition.


Family Pension Does Not Require a Succession Certificate


The Court also ruled that family pension is neither a debt nor a security. Therefore, authorities cannot demand a succession certificate before granting family pension to the rightful beneficiary.


Final Verdict


The Kerala High Court dismissed the petition, affirming that family pension is meant for the legally wedded spouse or eligible dependents. Employees cannot alter its distribution according to their will.

You Might Also Like

Intact Hymen Doesn’t Rule Out Penetrative Sexual Assault: Kerala HC

Person Convicted Under Both POCSO And IPC Face Higher Punishment: SC

Pension As Hard Earned Benefit Can’t Be Recovered Without Due Process: Chhattisgarh HC

How the 2018 Amendments Changed the Prevention of Corruption Act

Undressing Victim Without Intercourse Is Attempt to Rape: Allahabad High Court

TAGGED:DivorceEmployeeKerala High CourtMaintenancewomen's rights
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court Section 479 BNSS Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Convicted Prisoners: Kerala High Court
Next Article IPC Section 498A: Cruelty By Husband Or Husband's Relatives Forcing Spouse to Convert is Cruelty: Madras High Court
2 Comments
  • Pingback: Father-in-law Has The Right To Evict His Son-in-law From His...
  • Pingback: Employee’s Widow Is Entitled To Pension & Compensation For Extreme Service Conditions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POCSO Act
NewsPOCSO & Sexual CrimesSupreme Court

Absence of External Injuries Not Sufficient to Discredit Victim’s Credible Testimony: Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 weeks ago
RTI Act Exemptions: What Information Cannot Be Disclosed Under Section 8 and 9
Offences And Prosecution (Section 132 of GST Act)
Forcing Couples To Stay Together Amount To “Mental Cruelty”, Creates Fictional Bond By Law: Punjab And Haryana HC
Pulling a Woman’s Hand Without Criminal Intent Does Not Outrage Modesty: Madras High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?