By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Criminal > Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination
CriminalNewsSupreme CourtWomen Rights

Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 6, 2025 8:38 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE


The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that if an alleged rape victim refuses a medical examination, adverse inference can be drawn against their claims. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice NK Singh made this observation while deciding an appeal filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh against a High Court judgment that acquitted the accused in a rape case.

Contents
Legal Precedent CitedCase BackgroundHigh Court Overturned ConvictionWhat Is POCSO Act?


Legal Precedent Cited


Referring to Dola v. State of Odisha (2018) 18 SCC 695, the Court reiterated that denying medical examination raises doubts about the allegations. “It is a well-settled proposition of law that non-allowance of medical examination by an alleged rape victim raises negative inferences against them,” the bench noted.


Case Background


The case stemmed from an FIR filed in 2007 by the father of the alleged victim. He claimed that the accused entered their house in their absence and committed sexual assault on his daughter.
During the medical examination at Regional Hospital, Hamirpur, the prosecutrix was found to be of unsound mind and did not cooperate. To ascertain sexual assault, she was referred to RPMC Hospital, Tanda (Dharamshala). However, her father refused further medical tests.


High Court Overturned Conviction

While the trial court convicted the accused, he was later acquitted.

The High Court noted that the prosecutrix and her parents did not fully cooperate with medical staff. This weakened their version of events. Additionally, the prosecutrix’s mother turned hostile, and her father made evasive statements.
The High Court also observed that the prosecutrix was not mentally unsound, as she could understand and respond during cross-examination. Given these factors and the limited scope of interfering with acquittals, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision.

What Is POCSO Act?

The POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act) protects minors from sexual abuse and exploitation. It defines offenses, sets strict punishments, and ensures child-friendly procedures. Authorities must handle cases sensitively to safeguard victims’ rights.

You Might Also Like

Husband’s Disinterest In Family Life And Insistence On Superstitious Beliefs Amounted To Mental Cruelty: Kerala HC

Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Forcing Students To Travel To Distant Exam Centres Violate Right to Education Under Article 21: Punjab And Haryana HC

Complainant Cannot Demand Hearing in Bail Cases Under Juvenile Justice Act: Delhi HC

TAGGED:Minor ChildrenPOCSOPOCSO ActProtection of Children from Sexual Offences ActSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madhya Pradesh Denial of Education Amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court Grants Divorce
Next Article Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments How To File A Complaint Under The Special Marriage Act
5 Comments
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Constitutional Provisions, Imposes Rs. 10,000 Fine - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: If Medical Experts Determine Hospitalization Is Necessary, Insurers Must Honor Claim: J&K High Court - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Proton Mail Not Blocked in India, Union Govt Informs Karnataka HC - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Medical Negligence: All You Need To Know - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
Marriage and DivorceNewsSupreme Court

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 month ago
Lack of Birth Certificate No Bar for Sports Participation: Delhi High Court
The Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA), 2023
Place Of Supply Rules: Section 10 of CGST Act
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?