By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: BNSS Section 210: Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > BNSS Section 210: Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court
BNSSPunjab & Haryana High Court

BNSS Section 210: Witness Statement Not Required To Take Cognizance By Magistrate, Says Punjab & Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 5, 2025 1:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
19 hours ago
Share
How To Be A Witness Of A Marriage Registration
How To Be A Witness Of A Marriage Registration
SHARE

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that under Section 210(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, a Magistrate is not required to record witness statements or summon the aggrieved party before taking cognizance or issuing process. Justice Sanjay Vashisth clarified that the Magistrate can act on personal knowledge or information from any person other than a police officer. The Court emphasized that cognizance depends solely on the Magistrate’s satisfaction and no specific procedure is needed before issuing process. In warrant cases, the Magistrate can summon the accused under Section 227(1)(b) BNSS for appearance. The Court also stated that Section 211 ensures the accused’s right to file objections, protecting against false accusations. These observations came while dismissing a plea by four police officials challenging their summoning in a custodial death case.

The Court found sufficient material was present before the Magistrate, including statements from witnesses and officials. It held that the accused approached the Court prematurely, and there was no violation of procedure. The Court concluded that the Magistrate’s action was lawful and within the scope of BNSS, 2023.

You Might Also Like

Section 362 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure When After Commencement Of Inquiry Or Trial, Magistrate Finds Case Should Be Committed.

Section 237 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Words In Charge Taken In Sense Of Law Under Which Offence Is Punishable.

Section 36 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure Of Arrest And Duties Of Officer Making Arrest.

Section 265 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence For Prosecution.

Section 147 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Enforcement Of Order Of Maintenance.

TAGGED:Aggrieved PartyCognizable CasesCognizanceCognizance of OffensesMagistrate CognizancePunjab and Haryana High courtWitness Statements
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Right to Maintenance For Women Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court
Next Article Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184)
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184) - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute
Allahabad High CourtNews

Absence Due To Imprisonment Does Not Create Right To Wages: Allahabad High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Earning: Bombay High Court Clarifies Rule
What Are The Legal Rights and Responsibilities of International Students in India
Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI’s Clarification
ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?

Third Party Insurance and Compensation: Understanding Section 147 of the MV Act

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Overspeeding and Rash Driving Penalties Under the MV Act (Section 184)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?