By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: 6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > 6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court
NewsSupreme Court

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 26, 2025 10:26 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court
6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards: Warns Supreme Court
SHARE

6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare Boards

The Supreme Court has directed non-compliant states to file responses regarding the establishment of Transgender Welfare Boards, a 6-week deadline or face a penalty of ₹20,000. A bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti issued the warning, noting repeated delays in the case.

Contents
6-Week Deadline For States on Transgender Welfare BoardsCourt Order DetailsBackground of the PIL


Court Order Details


The bench stated, “If the response is not filed within six weeks, the concerned states will have to deposit ₹20,000 with the Legal Services Authority.” The petitioner, Kinner Maa Eksamajik Sanstha Trust, informed the court that states like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, and Rajasthan have already established Welfare Boards, but others have yet to comply.


Background of the PIL


The PIL highlights the discrimination and stigma faced by transgender individuals in areas such as housing, health, education, and employment. It claims that despite the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, issues like social exclusion and lack of resources remain unresolved.
The plea also points out contradictions in the Trans Act, such as requiring surgery proof for gender identification, which violates the Supreme Court’s NALSA judgment. The petitioner argues for the formation of Welfare Boards to address these issues and proposes a Standing Committee to investigate abuse cases against trans persons.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court To Review Alleged Flaws In Punjab & Haryana Judicial Service Exam

CrPC Section 377: Appeal by State Government Against Sentence – Code of Criminal Procedure

Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination

Supreme Court Rules Legal Heirs Not Liable for Partnership Firm’s Debts After Partner’s Death

Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event

TAGGED:Legal Services AuthorityPILSupreme Courttransgender rights
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article MP High Court Violations Of Service Rules Do Not Qualify As Public Duty Under Article 226: MP High Court
Next Article How To File A Case Under The Arbitration And Conciliation Act? Arbitral Award Is Void When Specific Dispute Alone Is Referred: Kerala HC
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Employer Cannot Withhold Gratuity Without Recovery Proceedings

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
MP High Court
High CourtMadhya Pradesh High CourtNews

Violations Of Service Rules Do Not Qualify As Public Duty Under Article 226: MP High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Article 143 of the Constitution: The President’s Power to Consult the Supreme Court
SC or ST Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Members of the Same Community: Punjab & Haryana HC
Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench
Minor Girl Has Domain Over Her Body, Can Choose To Terminate Pregnancy: Madras HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?