I secured a job at a prestigious ICSSR Institute in [Month] 2015 through the ST category reservation. The advertisement mentioned following state rules, but the institute later claimed there were no written rules regarding this in their act. After my appointment, the institute announced they would follow central government rules. However, in September 2015, the High Court declared my appointment invalid and ordered its termination. Could you shed some light on the legal complexities of this situation, specifically the conflict between state and central government rules regarding reservations?
Best Answer
The conflict arises from the differing reservation policies of state and central governments. The institute, under its act, may have followed state rules initially, but later switched to central government rules. This change, coupled with the High Court’s reliance on central government rules for your appointment, created legal complexities. The court’s decision likely hinged on the specific wording of the institute’s act and the relevant reservation policies in effect.
Please login or Register to submit your answer