Nine individuals stand accused in a case, with the main suspect, A1, missing. The trial has begun without him. Prosecutors claim A1 was the mastermind behind the crime, yet his address in the charge sheet lists Kerala, while details surrounding the crime suggest he lives in Andhra Pradesh. No evidence has been presented to connect these two addresses, and the prosecution has remained silent on this discrepancy. Could this silence undermine their conspiracy theory?
Best Answer
Yes, the prosecution’s silence on the discrepancy between A1’s address in the charge sheet and the evidence surrounding the crime could undermine their conspiracy theory. Under Indian law, the prosecution must establish a connection between the accused and the crime beyond reasonable doubt. The inconsistency raises questions about the reliability of the prosecution’s evidence and could weaken their case against the other accused individuals.
Please login or Register to submit your answer