My consumer forum case summons was signed on a registered acknowledgement, but the company’s rubber stamp is missing. The post office says the document was delivered to the opponent, but they claim they never received it. The opponent even filed a reply after over 3 years! What do the High Court, Supreme Court, or National Consumer Forum say about this kind of situation? What’s your advice?

Indian law emphasizes the importance of proper service of summons. While the post office’s confirmation is valuable, the absence of the company’s stamp raises concerns. The court may consider the opponent’s reply as evidence of receipt, but ultimately, the burden of proof lies with you to establish proper service. You should consult a legal professional to explore options for proving service and ensuring the case progresses effectively.