A man accused me of hitting him with a stone, causing injuries and tooth loss. The police registered a case and referred him to a government hospital for examination. The hospital found he sustained the injuries in a drunken state. However, the police officer suppressed this report and filed another report claiming grievous hurt. During the trial, all witnesses turned hostile. The officer who filed the second report admitted he was not authorized to issue medical certificates. Despite submitting the government hospital’s report, the court refused to mark it as evidence or call the doctor. Ultimately, I was convicted for causing hurt. The appellate court reduced my sentence to 6 months.
I have a few doubts. Firstly, isn’t the police officer’s suppression of the first medical report and filing a false report a fraud? If so, wouldn’t this make the judgment invalid?
Best Answer
Yes, the police officer’s actions constitute a fraud under Indian law, potentially impacting the judgment’s validity. The suppression of the first report and filing a false report with an unauthorized medical certificate raise serious concerns about the investigation’s integrity and could be grounds for challenging the judgment.
Please login or Register to submit your answer


