Reading: We, a group of 12 residents from a large Bangalore apartment complex (over 1000 units), filed a joint complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in April 2016 against the builder. We were the first to file such a complaint regarding this specific project, and our case does not represent other residents. The NCDRC allowed our joint complaint as our grievances were identical – poor service, fraudulent practices, and lack of occupancy certificate, among others. However, a recent NCDRC judgment on October 7, 2016, concerning “class suits” seems contradictory. We are concerned if this new ruling could lead to the dismissal of our joint complaint and require us to refile individually, even though our complaint was accepted under Section 12(1)(c)? We would appreciate any insights to clear our confusion and alleviate our concerns.

We, a group of 12 residents from a large Bangalore apartment complex (over 1000 units), filed a joint complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in April 2016 against the builder. We were the first to file such a complaint regarding this specific project, and our case does not represent other residents. The NCDRC allowed our joint complaint as our grievances were identical – poor service, fraudulent practices, and lack of occupancy certificate, among others. However, a recent NCDRC judgment on October 7, 2016, concerning “class suits” seems contradictory. We are concerned if this new ruling could lead to the dismissal of our joint complaint and require us to refile individually, even though our complaint was accepted under Section 12(1)(c)? We would appreciate any insights to clear our confusion and alleviate our concerns.

Last updated: August 25, 2025 1:04 pm

Apni Law

1 year ago

Law Forum › Category: Consumer Court › We, a group of 12 residents from a large Bangalore apartment complex (over 1000 units), filed a joint complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in April 2016 against the builder. We were the first to file such a complaint regarding this specific project, and our case does not represent other residents. The NCDRC allowed our joint complaint as our grievances were identical – poor service, fraudulent practices, and lack of occupancy certificate, among others. However, a recent NCDRC judgment on October 7, 2016, concerning “class suits” seems contradictory. We are concerned if this new ruling could lead to the dismissal of our joint complaint and require us to refile individually, even though our complaint was accepted under Section 12(1)(c)? We would appreciate any insights to clear our confusion and alleviate our concerns.

Vote Up
291
Vote Down

Apni Law Staff asked 1 year ago

We, a group of 12 residents from a large Bangalore apartment complex (over 1000 units), filed a joint complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in April 2016 against the builder. We were the first to file such a complaint regarding this specific project, and our case does not represent other residents. The NCDRC allowed our joint complaint as our grievances were identical – poor service, fraudulent practices, and lack of occupancy certificate, among others. However, a recent NCDRC judgment on October 7, 2016, concerning “class suits” seems contradictory. We are concerned if this new ruling could lead to the dismissal of our joint complaint and require us to refile individually, even though our complaint was accepted under Section 12(1)(c)? We would appreciate any insights to clear our confusion and alleviate our concerns.

1 Answers

Vote Up
26
Vote Down

Best Answer

Apni Law Staff answered 1 year ago

The NCDRC’s October 7, 2016 judgment on “class suits” might not necessarily affect your joint complaint. While it established guidelines for class suits, your complaint predates this ruling and was accepted under Section 12(1)(c) based on identical grievances. Consult with a legal professional for specific guidance on your case.