My lawyer is trying to cross-examine the other party in a civil case in court. However, their lawyer keeps interrupting, saying the questions are irrelevant. My lawyer has cited Section 144 of the Evidence Act to justify the questions, but the judge seems to agree with the other side and keeps asking for proof. These questions are crucial to get to the heart of the matter, but the interruptions are delaying the process. What can I do to ensure my lawyer can effectively cross-examine the defendant?
Best Answer
You can ask your lawyer to formally object to the opposing lawyer’s repeated interruptions, citing the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Evidence Act, particularly Section 144. You can also request the judge to issue directions to ensure fair cross-examination and prevent unnecessary delays.
Please login or Register to submit your answer