My case under Section 138 is ongoing in the magistrate’s court. The complainant claims I bought goods from him and presented carbon copies of bills with my signature. I appealed to the Bombay High Court, arguing that the original bills were missing. The High Court ruled that the complainant must provide the originals to help handwriting experts determine authenticity. But now, the complainant claims he doesn’t have the original bills. Will the case be dismissed?
Best Answer
The magistrate court will likely consider the complainant’s inability to produce the original bills as a significant hurdle. The High Court’s order mandated their production for expert analysis, and their absence weakens the complainant’s case. However, the court will also consider other evidence presented and the specific details of your case before deciding on dismissal.
Please login or Register to submit your answer