By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: 174A IPC: Non-Appearance in Response to Section 82 Proclamation (Act 2 of 1974)
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > IPC > 174A IPC: Non-Appearance in Response to Section 82 Proclamation (Act 2 of 1974)
IPC

174A IPC: Non-Appearance in Response to Section 82 Proclamation (Act 2 of 1974)

Apni Law
Last updated: November 20, 2024 9:44 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Indian Penal Code – 174A: Non-Appearance in Response to Section 82 Proclamation (Act 2 of 1974)

Contents
1. State the Code2. Explanation3. Illustration4. Common Questions and Answers

1. State the Code

Section 174A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), as amended by Act 2 of 1974, deals with the offense of non-appearance in response to a proclamation issued under Section 82 of the CrPC. This section was introduced to provide a legal framework to address the situation when an accused person avoids appearing in court despite being summoned.

2. Explanation

Section 82 of the CrPC empowers a Magistrate to issue a proclamation for the appearance of a person accused of an offense. This proclamation is published in a local newspaper and is also affixed at a prominent place in the accused’s usual place of residence. The accused is required to appear before the court within a specified time period.

Section 174A of the IPC states that if a person, after being duly served with the proclamation under Section 82, fails to appear before the court within the stipulated time, they are deemed to have committed an offense punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine, or with both.

3. Illustration

Imagine a situation where a person named ‘X’ is accused of theft. The Magistrate issues a proclamation under Section 82, calling upon ‘X’ to appear in court within 30 days. The proclamation is published in a local newspaper and is also affixed at ‘X’s residence. Despite this, ‘X’ does not appear before the court within the specified time period. In this case, ‘X’ has committed an offense under Section 174A of the IPC and can be punished accordingly.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q: What is the purpose of Section 174A of the IPC?

A: Section 174A aims to ensure the appearance of accused persons in court and to punish those who deliberately avoid attending court proceedings.

Q: What are the consequences of non-appearance in response to a Section 82 proclamation?

A: Non-appearance can result in imprisonment for up to one month, a fine, or both. This is in addition to the punishment for the original offense.

Q: Can a person be punished under Section 174A even if they have a valid reason for non-appearance?

A: Yes, but the court has the power to consider the circumstances and decide whether to impose a punishment. The accused can present evidence to justify their absence.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 117: Order to Give Security – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 368 CrPC: High Court Power to Confirm Sentence or Annul Conviction

CrPC Section 265D: Reporting Mutually Satisfactory Dispositions in Criminal Cases

Section 336 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Evidence Of Public Servants, Experts, Police Officers In Certain Cases.

Section 232 CrPC: Acquittal – Code of Criminal Procedure Explained

TAGGED:174A IPCAct 2 of 1974Criminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeIndian LawIndian Penal Codelegal proceedingsNon-AppearanceProclamationSection 82
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article IPC 171C: Undue Influence at Elections in India
Next Article IPC Section 175: Omission to Produce Document to Public Servant
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
CriminalNewsSupreme Court

Convicts of Heinous Crimes Still Entitled to Basic Legal Protections: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence Due to Unfair Trial

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Special Pension Benefits Apply Only When Death Occurs In Direct Connection With Official Duties: Delhi High Court
Supreme Court Postpones Hearing On Savukku Shankar’s Plea Against 16 FIRs, Tamil Nadu To Submit Additional Documents
Family Courts To Summon Children Only In Rare And Exceptional Situations: Kerala HC
Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Work Related Injury to Employee

Denying Regularization To Temporary Workers After 8 Years of Service Is Unfair, Says HP High Court

High Court of Jammu & Kashmir

Alibi Defence Can’t Justify Quashing Charge Sheet Before Trial, Says J&K High Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?