By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using ‘Domino’ Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using ‘Domino’ Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy
High CourtNews

Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using ‘Domino’ Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy

Apni Law
Last updated: March 26, 2025 10:25 am
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using 'Domino' Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy
Delhi High Court Orders Food Outlets to Cease Using 'Domino' Marks, Removes Them from Zomato and Swiggy
SHARE

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of Domino’s Pizza in a trademark infringement case. This is against eight food outlets. The court has restrained these outlets from using marks such as ‘Domino’, ‘Domino’s’, ‘Dominon’,. Similar variations, citing unauthorized adoption of trade names identical or deceptively similar to Domino’s Pizza’s trademarks.

Justice Sanjeev Narula issued an order directing popular food delivery platforms, Zomato and Swiggy. This is to remove the concerned outlets from their platforms. Thus, emphasizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights.

Domino’s Pizza alleged that the unauthorized use of its marks by the food outlets was causing confusion among consumers. Moreover, unfairly leveraging the popularity of the Domino’s brand. The court agreed, noting that the impugned marks were phonetically, visually, and structurally similar to Domino’s registered trademarks.

Furthermore, the court highlighted the significant consumer impact of misrepresentation in the food industry. Especially given the widespread marketing and consumption of food products. It stressed the need for stringent measures to preserve the integrity of Domino’s brand identity. Additionally, prevent consumer confusion.

Conclusion

The legal counsel representing Domino’s Pizza argued convincingly, leading to a favorable ruling for the plaintiffs. The court’s decision sets a precedent for robust trademark protection in India and underscores the importance of upholding intellectual property rights in the digital age.

Domino’s Pizza is a global pizza chain known for its fast delivery and variety of flavors. Its trademark includes the iconic red and blue logo with three dots. The brand protects its name, logo, and slogans. Trademark laws prevent unauthorized use, ensuring brand identity and customer trust worldwide.

A trademark is a legal protection for a brand’s name, logo, or slogan. It distinguishes businesses and prevents unauthorized use. Registered trademarks offer exclusive rights and build brand identity. Companies use them to protect reputation and consumer trust. Trademark laws ensure fair competition and prevent confusion in the marketplace.

Case Title: DOMINOS IP HOLDER LLC & ANR v. MS DOMINO PIZZA & ORS.

You Might Also Like

Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC

Understanding Pre-Sentence Hearings in India: Meaning, Purpose & Application

Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises

Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists’ Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against ‘Malayala Manorama

Domestic Violence Case Can Be Filed By Mother-in-Laws If Harassed By Their Daughter-in-Law: Allahabad HC

TAGGED:Delhi High CourtDomino's Pizzafood outletslegal actionSwiggytrademark infringementtrademark protectionZomato
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article NDPS Act Search & Seizure Provisions in Landmark Judgment NDPS Act Search & Seizure Provisions in Landmark Judgment
Next Article Section 28 CrPC: Sentences High Courts & Sessions Judges Can Pass – Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
CriminalHigh CourtMadras High CourtNews

Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Watching ‘Child Sex Abuse’ Material a Criminal Offence : SC
Supreme Court Petition Calls For High-Powered Committee To Investigate EVM Manipulation Allegations
Long Term Live-In Relationship Undermines Rape Allegation Based on False Promise of Marriage: SC
Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?