By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Marriage and Divorce > Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC
FamilyMarriage and DivorceNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: May 2, 2025 8:48 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 weeks ago
Share
Divorce Laws In India: What Every NRI Should Know
Divorce Laws In India: What Every NRI Should Know
SHARE

Unexplained Relationship with Woman

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that a husband’s unexplained relationship with another woman amounts to cruelty. This act alone, the court said, is enough to break a marriage.

Contents
Unexplained Relationship with WomanCase BackgroundPetitioner’s StanceCourt’s RulingFinal Verdict


Case Background


The husband challenged a family court’s order that had denied his plea for divorce. He claimed that his wife treated him and his family with cruelty. He also alleged that her accusations about his illicit relationship damaged their marriage.
The couple married in 2011 under the Hindu Marriage Act.


Petitioner’s Stance


The husband denied any illicit relationship with the woman in question. He argued that he had no improper connection with her and that the wife’s behavior caused the marriage to fall apart.


Court’s Ruling


The bench, comprising Justice Sudhir Singh and Justice Sukhvinder Kaur, rejected the husband’s claim. It found that his ongoing relationship with another woman, without any valid explanation, amounted to cruelty.
The court noted that the husband admitted to knowing the woman and traveling with her multiple times. This included trips by air, train, and even a visit to Goa.
Justice Singh stated that the husband’s admission and related evidence clearly showed that he disrupted the marriage.


Final Verdict


The court acknowledged that the couple had lived separately since 2018. However, it held that long separation alone was not enough to grant a divorce in this case.
The bench concluded that the husband’s actions caused the marital breakdown. As a result, the court dismissed his divorce plea.

You Might Also Like

ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Directs Petitioner To Karnataka High Court For Landslide Rescue Operations

Night time Arrest Restrictions for Women Are Not Mandatory: Madras High Court

Alimony and Maintenance Can Be Granted Even If Marriage Is Declared Void: SC

Rape on False Promise of Marriage’ Does Not Apply to Married Women: Kerala High Court

TAGGED:CheatingCrueltyDivorceHindu MarriageHindu Marriage Actillicit relationshipmental crueltyPunjab and Haryana High court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To Get A Copy Of A Police Report (Challan) Know Your Rights Before Filing An FIR
Next Article Police Station What Is The General Diary Of The Police And How Is It Related To An FIR?
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Marriage No Defence Under POCSO Act: Madras HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case
CriminalHigh CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Arresting Accused Under New Charge After Granting Bail In Same FIR Violates Fundamental Rights: Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court
Supreme Court Directs Health Ministry To Expedite Implementation Of NCAHP Act
Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC
Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?