By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Marriage and Divorce > Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC
FamilyMarriage and DivorceNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: May 2, 2025 8:48 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Share
Divorce Laws In India: What Every NRI Should Know
Divorce Laws In India: What Every NRI Should Know
SHARE

Unexplained Relationship with Woman

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that a husband’s unexplained relationship with another woman amounts to cruelty. This act alone, the court said, is enough to break a marriage.

Contents
Unexplained Relationship with WomanCase BackgroundPetitioner’s StanceCourt’s RulingFinal Verdict


Case Background


The husband challenged a family court’s order that had denied his plea for divorce. He claimed that his wife treated him and his family with cruelty. He also alleged that her accusations about his illicit relationship damaged their marriage.
The couple married in 2011 under the Hindu Marriage Act.


Petitioner’s Stance


The husband denied any illicit relationship with the woman in question. He argued that he had no improper connection with her and that the wife’s behavior caused the marriage to fall apart.


Court’s Ruling


The bench, comprising Justice Sudhir Singh and Justice Sukhvinder Kaur, rejected the husband’s claim. It found that his ongoing relationship with another woman, without any valid explanation, amounted to cruelty.
The court noted that the husband admitted to knowing the woman and traveling with her multiple times. This included trips by air, train, and even a visit to Goa.
Justice Singh stated that the husband’s admission and related evidence clearly showed that he disrupted the marriage.


Final Verdict


The court acknowledged that the couple had lived separately since 2018. However, it held that long separation alone was not enough to grant a divorce in this case.
The bench concluded that the husband’s actions caused the marital breakdown. As a result, the court dismissed his divorce plea.

You Might Also Like

Recent Amendments to the Negotiable Instruments Act You Must Know

Grabbing Breasts Of Minor And Dragging Not Attempt To Rape: SC Takes Cognizance of HC Order

Supreme Court Requires Specific Allegations To Hold Directors Liable For Company Offences Under National Housing Bank Act

What Are The Rights Of Women In India

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4

TAGGED:CheatingCrueltyDivorceHindu MarriageHindu Marriage Actillicit relationshipmental crueltyPunjab and Haryana High court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article How To Get A Copy Of A Police Report (Challan) Know Your Rights Before Filing An FIR
Next Article Police Station What Is The General Diary Of The Police And How Is It Related To An FIR?
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Marriage No Defence Under POCSO Act: Madras HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn't Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
News

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Companies Cannot Restrict Employees from New Jobs via Non-Compete Clause : Delhi HC
Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Promissory Estoppel And Legitimate Expectation In Light Of Legislative Changes
Alimony and Maintenance Can Be Granted Even If Marriage Is Declared Void: SC
Cohabitation With Deception About First Marriage Amounts to Rape: Telangana HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Key Clauses of a Valid Contract

Difference Between Contract and Agreement Under the Indian Contract Act

Key Clauses of a Valid Contract

Performance Of Contracts: What If One Party Fails

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?