By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 222 CrPC: Offence Proved Included in Offence Charged
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 222 CrPC: Offence Proved Included in Offence Charged
CrPC

Section 222 CrPC: Offence Proved Included in Offence Charged

Apni Law
Last updated: December 2, 2024 9:00 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 222 CrPC: Offence Proved Included in Offence Charged

Contents
1. State the Code2. Explanation3. Illustration4. Common Questions & Answers

1. State the Code

Section 222 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the situation where an accused is charged with one offence but the evidence presented proves a different offence which is “included” in the original charge.

2. Explanation

This section states that if during a trial, the evidence presented proves that the accused has committed an offence which is “included” within the offence they were originally charged with, the accused can be convicted of that “included” offence even though they were not specifically charged with it.

The key concept here is “included” offence. An offence is considered “included” if it is:

  • A lesser offence – The accused is charged with a more serious offence, but the evidence only proves they committed a lesser one.
  • A constituent part of the offence charged – The offence charged is made up of multiple elements, and the evidence only proves the accused committed one or some of those elements.

3. Illustration

Imagine someone is charged with **murder** (a serious offence). During the trial, the evidence only proves they committed **culpable homicide not amounting to murder** (a lesser offence). In this case, under Section 222, the accused can be convicted of the lesser offence even though they were originally charged with murder.

4. Common Questions & Answers

  • Q: Can the accused be convicted of an offence they were not charged with?
    A: Yes, but only if the offence proven is “included” within the original charge.
  • Q: What happens if the evidence proves an entirely different offence not “included” in the original charge?
    A: In this case, the accused cannot be convicted of that offence. The prosecution would need to file a separate charge for that offence.
  • Q: Does Section 222 require the prosecution to specifically mention the “included” offence in the charge sheet?
    A: No, it’s not mandatory. The prosecution can bring the “included” offence to the court’s attention during the trial based on the evidence presented.

You Might Also Like

Section 262 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – When Accused Shall Be Discharged.

Section 415 CrPC: Postponement of Death Sentence Execution During Supreme Court Appeal

Section 212 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Making Over Of Cases To Magistrates.

IPC Section 173: Preventing Service of Summons or Publication in India

Section 212 CrPC: Particulars of Time, Place, and Person – Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:Court ProceedingsCriminal JusticeCriminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCIndian LawLaw EnforcementLegalOffence ChargedOffence ProvedSection 222
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 218: Separate Charges for Distinct Offences – Explained
Next Article Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Medical Termination of Pregnancy
CriminalJammu & Kashmir High CourtNewsPunjab & Haryana High CourtWomen Rights

Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Accused Has No Right to Oppose ED’s Application Under PMLA Section 50: Allahabad High Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea By Bilkis Bano Rape Case Convicts Challenging Remission Revocation
Chief Justice Of India Inaugurates Vigentennial Celebrations Of Madurai Bench Of Madras Court
Guest Faculty Not a ‘Workman’ Under Industrial Disputes Act : Calcutta High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?