By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 219 CrPC: Charging Three Similar Offenses Within a Year
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 219 CrPC: Charging Three Similar Offenses Within a Year
CrPC

Section 219 CrPC: Charging Three Similar Offenses Within a Year

Apni Law
Last updated: April 7, 2024 12:00 am
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 219 CrPC: Charging Three Similar Offenses Within a Year

This section of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) deals with the limitation on the number of similar offenses that can be charged against an individual within a year.

1. The Code

Section 219 CrPC states:

“Where, in the case of any person, three or more charges for offenses of the same kind, committed within a period of twelve months, are pending before any Magistrate, the Magistrate shall, after recording the fact that the charges are pending, forward all the cases to the Sessions Judge for such orders as he thinks fit.”

2. Explanation

This section essentially dictates that if an individual faces three or more charges for similar offenses within a 12-month period, the Magistrate handling the case must forward all the cases to the Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge then decides the appropriate course of action.

The purpose of this section is to prevent:

  • Harassment of the accused: Multiple charges for similar offenses within a short time can be seen as an attempt to harass the accused.
  • Unnecessary burden on the judiciary: Repeated trials for similar offenses can unnecessarily burden the court system.
  • Inefficient use of resources: Time and resources spent on multiple trials for similar offenses could be better utilized elsewhere.

3. Illustration

Imagine a person is charged with three cases of petty theft within a year. In this scenario, the Magistrate handling any of these cases would be required to forward all three cases to the Sessions Judge. The Sessions Judge could then:

  • Order a single trial for all three offenses.
  • Dismiss some of the charges.
  • Take any other action deemed necessary.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q: What constitutes “offenses of the same kind”?

A: This is a matter of interpretation, but generally, offenses are considered “of the same kind” if they share similar elements, intent, and consequences. For example, multiple counts of theft, assault, or criminal trespass could be considered offenses of the same kind.

Q: Does this section apply to all Magistrates?

A: Yes, Section 219 CrPC applies to all Magistrates, regardless of their jurisdiction.

Q: Can the Sessions Judge override the Magistrate’s decision to forward the cases?

A: No, the Sessions Judge is bound by the Magistrate’s decision to forward the cases under Section 219 CrPC. The Sessions Judge can only order a course of action regarding the forwarded cases.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 114: Copy of Order with Summons or Warrant – Legal Guide

CrPC Section 465: Reversible Errors, Omissions, and Irregularities in Findings or Sentences

Section 205 CrPC: Magistrate’s Discretion to Dispense with Accused’s Personal Attendance

Section 281 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power To Stop Proceedings In Certain Cases.

Section 183 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Recording Of Confessions And Statements.

TAGGED:ChargingCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCIndiaIndian LawLawLegalMultiple ChargesOffensesSection 219Similar OffensesWithin a Year
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 218: Separate Charges for Distinct Offences – Explained
Next Article Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Requires Specific Allegations To Hold Directors Liable For Company Offences Under National Housing Bank Act

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Delhi High Court Interprets Section 531(2)(a) Of BNSS 2023, Emphasises Applicability To Pending Appeals
Vulgar Chatting with Other Men Amounts to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh HC
Passport Can Be Issued Despite Pending Criminal Case Only By Court: J&K High Court
Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Accident Compensation Under the MV Act: What Victims and Families Should Know (Sections 166–168)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?