By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 163 CrPC: No Inducement to be Offered – Code of Criminal Procedure
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 163 CrPC: No Inducement to be Offered – Code of Criminal Procedure
CrPC

Section 163 CrPC: No Inducement to be Offered – Code of Criminal Procedure

Apni Law
Last updated: May 26, 2024 12:06 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 163 CrPC: No Inducement to be Offered

Contents
1. State the Code2. Explain it3. Illustrate it4. Common Questions and AnswersQ. What are the consequences of violating Section 163 CrPC?Q. Can a confession made in the presence of a lawyer be considered valid?Q. What if the accused person confesses willingly without any inducement?

This section of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) deals with the prohibition of offering any inducement, threat, or promise to a person being questioned during police custody.

1. State the Code

Section 163 CrPC: No inducement, threat or promise to be held out to accused person to confess.

2. Explain it

Section 163 CrPC explicitly states that no police officer can induce, threaten, or promise anything to a person in their custody to compel a confession. This provision aims to ensure that any confession obtained from a person in custody is voluntary and not coerced.

The following actions are strictly prohibited under this section:

  • Offering rewards or benefits for confessing
  • Threatening with harm or punishment for refusing to confess
  • Making promises of leniency or lighter punishment in exchange for a confession

3. Illustrate it

Let’s say a suspect is arrested for theft. The investigating officer tries to get the suspect to confess by offering him a lighter sentence if he confesses. This would be a violation of Section 163 CrPC as it constitutes an inducement.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q. What are the consequences of violating Section 163 CrPC?

A. The confession obtained through inducement, threat, or promise is considered inadmissible in court. The officer can also face disciplinary action or even criminal charges.

Q. Can a confession made in the presence of a lawyer be considered valid?

A. Yes, if the confession is made in the presence of a lawyer and the suspect is aware of their rights, it can be considered valid. However, the lawyer must ensure that the confession is voluntary and not coerced.

Q. What if the accused person confesses willingly without any inducement?

A. If the confession is made willingly and voluntarily, without any pressure or coercion, it can be admitted as evidence in court.

You Might Also Like

CrPC Section 235: Judgment of Acquittal or Conviction – Explained

CrPC Section 132: Protection Against Prosecution for Acts Done Under Previous Sections

CrPC Section 78: Warrant Execution Outside Jurisdiction – Legal Guide

CrPC Section 314: Oral & Written Arguments – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 3 CrPC: Construction of References in Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:- Section 163 CrPC - Criminal Procedure Code - Inducement - Confession - Evidence - Criminal Law - Legal Procedure - Indian Law - Criminal Justice - Police Investigation
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 218: Separate Charges for Distinct Offences – Explained
Next Article Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POSH Act - Women at Workplace
Employment & BusinessIndian ConstitutionNewsSupreme Court

Right to Voluntarily Close Business Under Article 19(1)(g): SC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 weeks ago
Life Sentence Of Anu Shanthi In Attingal Double Murder Case Suspended By Supreme Court
Confession of Co-Accused Alone Can’t Justify Charges Under NDPS Act: Madras HC
Watching ‘Child Sex Abuse’ Material a Criminal Offence : SC
Having Knowledge But No Intent To Kill Amounts To Culpable Homicide, MP HC Convicts Man Over Wife’s Death
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?