By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: CrPC Section 105I: Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture – Explained
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > CrPC Section 105I: Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture – Explained
CrPC

CrPC Section 105I: Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture – Explained

Apni Law
Last updated: May 22, 2024 5:51 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

CrPC Section 105I: Fine in Lieu of Forfeiture

Contents
1. The Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:Q1: What is the basis for the Magistrate’s discretion to impose a fine in lieu of forfeiture?A1:Q2: Can the Magistrate always impose a fine in lieu of forfeiture?A2:

This section deals with the option of paying a fine instead of forfeiting property seized under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

1. The Code:

Section 105I of the CrPC states:

“Where any property is liable to forfeiture under this Code, the Magistrate may, instead of ordering forfeiture, direct that the person in whose possession the property was found shall pay such fine as the Magistrate thinks fit, not exceeding the value of the property, in lieu of forfeiture.”

2. Explanation:

  • This section gives the Magistrate discretionary power to impose a fine instead of forfeiting property seized during a criminal investigation.
  • The fine amount cannot exceed the value of the property.
  • This provision is intended to be a lenient measure, allowing the person to avoid losing their property by paying a financial penalty.

3. Illustration:

Imagine a scenario where a police officer seizes a car suspected to have been used in a crime. The car is liable for forfeiture under the CrPC. However, the Magistrate, after considering the circumstances, feels that forfeiting the car would be too harsh a punishment. Instead, the Magistrate may impose a fine on the owner of the car, equal to its market value, in lieu of forfeiture.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q1: What is the basis for the Magistrate’s discretion to impose a fine in lieu of forfeiture?

A1:

The Magistrate’s discretion is based on the facts of the case and the circumstances surrounding the seizure of the property. Factors like the gravity of the offense, the involvement of the person in whose possession the property was found, and the potential hardship caused by forfeiture are considered.

Q2: Can the Magistrate always impose a fine in lieu of forfeiture?

A2:

No. The Magistrate’s discretion is not absolute. The section emphasizes that the fine should not exceed the value of the property. Moreover, the Magistrate may not choose to impose a fine if the forfeiture is deemed essential for the effective administration of justice.

You Might Also Like

Section 236 CrPC: Previous Conviction – Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 290: Execution of Foreign Commissions – Complete Guide

CrPC Section 319: Power to Proceed Against Other Persons Appearing Guilty of Offence

Section 258 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction.

CrPC Section 208: Supply of Copies to Accused in Court of Session Cases

TAGGED:Alternative PenaltyCriminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCFineForfeitureForfeiture LawIndian LawLawLegalPenaltyProcedureSection 105I
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC's Ruling on Muslim Woman's Right to Divorce via 'Khula' Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC’s Ruling on Muslim Woman’s Right to Divorce via ‘Khula’
Next Article ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal's Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court ED Argues Against Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea in Liquor Policy Case Before Delhi High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Delhi
Delhi High CourtNews

Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Madras High Court Questions Central Government’s Repeal Of Criminal Laws, Citing Potential Confusion And Delays
Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving
Plea Against MM Lawrence’s Body Donation For Medical Research Rejected By Supreme Court
Calcutta High Court Orders Release Of Student Protestor Sayan Lahiri, Criticises Police Action
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Madras

Phone Tapping Violates Right to Privacy under Article 21 Without Legal Grounds: Madras HC

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Maharashtra's Exemption For Private Unaided Schools From RTE Quota

Rape Cases Cannot Be Dropped Over Compromise, Victims May Face Perjury Charges: Bombay HC

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?