By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Jammu & Kashmir High Court > Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim
CriminalJammu & Kashmir High CourtNewsPunjab & Haryana High CourtWomen Rights

Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 13, 2025 4:39 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Medical Termination of Pregnancy
Medical Termination of Pregnancy
SHARE

Case Ruling

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court allowed the termination of a 28–29-week pregnancy of a mentally challenged minor who was a victim of sexual assault. The court emphasized that the right to life under Article 21 includes living free from mental trauma.
Justice Mohd. Yousuf Wani directed the Director of Health Services to facilitate the termination. The Social Welfare Department will cover all medical expenses. If the child survives, the state will arrange for lawful adoption. The District Legal Services Authority must initiate compensation proceedings under the victim compensation scheme.

Contents
Case RulingBackground of the CasePetitioner’s StanceRespondent’s StanceCourt’s ObservationsConclusion

Background of the Case

The victim, a mentally challenged minor, became pregnant due to sexual assault. Her mother filed a writ petition seeking termination. The victim had been placed in a shelter home, and medical reports confirmed she suffered from Mild Intellectual Disability (MID). Experts stated she could not understand pregnancy or childbirth.

Petitioner’s Stance

The victim’s mother sought termination, arguing that:
The minor could not understand or handle pregnancy and childbirth.
Continuing the pregnancy would cause severe mental trauma.
The victim’s social and psychological well-being would suffer in a conservative society.

Respondent’s Stance

The UT of J&K did not strongly oppose termination but argued that:
The pregnancy had crossed 28 weeks, requiring judicial approval.
The state was ready to provide medical care and arrange for adoption if the baby survived.

Court’s Observations

The court noted:
Article 21 guarantees a life free from mental distress.
The state must ensure the victim’s well-being.
Social stigma could severely impact the victim’s future.

Conclusion

The ruling prioritizes the victim’s mental health and dignity. It reaffirms the state’s duty to protect vulnerable citizens.

You Might Also Like

Suicide at Parental Home Doesn’t Exclude Dowry Death Charge: Delhi HC

Calcutta High Court Lifts Previous Ban On West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee

Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court’s Decision To Extend Payment Time In Contract Case

State Employees On Central Deputation Not Eligible For Central Pension: Supreme Court

Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC

TAGGED:Article 21High CourtJammu and KashmirMinor ChildrenPOCSO ActPregnancySexual Assault
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India Visually Impaired Candidates are Eligible For Judicial Service: Supreme Court Strikes Down MP Rule
Next Article Section 314 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Dishonest Misappropriation Of Property Section 314 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Dishonest Misappropriation Of Property.
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Trial Court Cannot Review Its Final Orders: Jammu and Kashmir HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
News

Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Denial of Education Amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court Grants Divorce
Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings
Isolated Lapses By Wife Do Not Disqualify Her From Claiming Maintenance: Patna HC
Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity, Rules On UP Education Officials’ Pay Scales
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?