By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > The Specific Relief Act > Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.
The Specific Relief Act

Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession.

Apni Law
Last updated: May 7, 2025 8:00 pm
Apni Law
2 months ago
Share
Section 8 - The Specific Relief Act - Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession
Section 8 - The Specific Relief Act - Liability Of Person In Possession, Not As Owner, To Deliver To Persons Entitled To Immediate Possession
SHARE

Code: Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act, 1963

Any person having the possession or control of a particular article of movable property, of which he is not the owner, may be compelled specifically to deliver it to the person entitled to its immediate possession, in any of the following cases:
(a) when the thing claimed is held by the defendant as the agent or trustee of the plaintiff;
(b) when compensation in money would not afford the plaintiff adequate relief for the loss of the thing claimed;
(c) when it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage caused by its loss;
(d) when the possession of the thing claimed has been wrongfully transferred from the plaintiff.

Explanation:—Unless and until the contrary is proved, the court shall, in respect of any article of movable property claimed under clause (b) or clause (c) of this section, presume—
(a) that compensation in money would not afford the plaintiff adequate relief for the loss of the thing claimed, or, as the case may be;
(b) that it would be extremely difficult to ascertain the actual damage caused by its loss.


Explanation of Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act

Section 8 of the Specific Relief Act deals with situations where a person is in possession of movable property, but is not its owner. It allows the rightful owner or person entitled to possession to seek specific delivery of the property. This provision is crucial when monetary compensation or damages would not adequately remedy the loss.

Contents
Code: Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act, 1963Explanation of Section 8 – The Specific Relief ActKey Highlights:Cases where this Section is Applicable:IllustrationExample 1: Agent Holding PropertyExample 2: Irreplaceable ItemExample 3: Wrongful Transfer of PropertyCommon Questions and Answers on Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act1. Who can file a suit under Section 8?2. Can a person be compelled to return property they do not own?3. What is the significance of “compensation in money”?4. Is there a presumption in law about damages for lost property?5. Can this law apply if the property was transferred illegally?Conclusion

Key Highlights:

  • The person in possession, but not as an owner, may be forced to return the property to the rightful person.
  • The section applies to cases where the property is held as an agent, trustee, or in a situation where the loss of the property is difficult to quantify in monetary terms.
  • The law presumes that monetary compensation would not be adequate when the loss of the item causes significant harm that cannot be easily quantified.

Cases where this Section is Applicable:

  • Agent/Trustee: If the person is holding the property in trust for the actual owner, they can be compelled to deliver it.
  • Difficulty in Compensation: When the loss of the property cannot be adequately compensated by money, such as in the case of sentimental value or rare items.
  • Wrongful Transfer: If the property has been unlawfully transferred or taken from the rightful owner, the original owner has the right to seek its return.

Illustration

Example 1: Agent Holding Property

A person lends their valuable painting to an agent for safekeeping. If the agent refuses to return it, the original owner can file a suit under Section 8 to compel the agent to return the painting.

Example 2: Irreplaceable Item

A rare antique vase is wrongfully taken from its owner. Since the value of the vase cannot be fully compensated with money, the owner can use Section 8 to force the person holding it to return it.

Example 3: Wrongful Transfer of Property

A person who had lent their mobile phone to a friend discovers that the phone was sold by the friend without permission. The rightful owner can compel the new possessor (or the friend) to return the phone under Section 8.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 8 – The Specific Relief Act

1. Who can file a suit under Section 8?

Anyone who is entitled to immediate possession of a movable property, even if they are not the legal owner, can file a suit under this section.

2. Can a person be compelled to return property they do not own?

Yes, if they possess the property without legal ownership and the actual owner is entitled to its immediate possession, they can be compelled to return it.

3. What is the significance of “compensation in money”?

Section 8 applies when monetary compensation is inadequate, particularly when the property has unique value or irreplaceable significance.

4. Is there a presumption in law about damages for lost property?

Yes, the court will presume that compensation is inadequate or that the actual damage caused by loss is difficult to ascertain, unless proven otherwise.

5. Can this law apply if the property was transferred illegally?

Yes, if the property was wrongfully transferred from the rightful owner, Section 8 allows them to seek its return.


Conclusion

Section 8 of the Specific Relief Act protects individuals who are entitled to possession of movable property by providing a legal mechanism for the recovery of that property. It ensures that property can be specifically recovered, especially in cases where monetary compensation is insufficient or where it’s difficult to assess the damage caused by the loss. Whether the property is held by an agent, trustee, or is unlawfully transferred, this section offers recourse to the rightful possessor.

For expert guidance on the recovery of movable property, visit ApniLaw.


You Might Also Like

Section 38 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Perpetual Injunction When Granted.

Section 18 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Non-Enforcement Except With Variation.

Section 12 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Specific Performance Of Part Of Contract.

Section 1 – The Specific Relief Act (SRA) – Short Title, Extent And Commencement.

Section 20 – The Specific Relief Act – Substituted Performance Of Contract

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Madras High Court Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC
Next Article Can Platforms Be Held Liable For Harmful Content - IT Act - Cyber Crime Can Social Media Platforms Be Held Liable For Harmful Content? Section 79 Explained
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
NDPS Act
High CourtNewsTelangana High Court

Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Financial Security Alone Not Important But Physical And Mental Factors To Maintain Custody of Child: Punjab And Haryana HC
Calcutta High Court Stresses Need For Forensic Science Capacity Building For Effective BNSS Implementation
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
State Employees On Central Deputation Not Eligible For Central Pension: Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Kerala

Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court

What If Spouse Denies Participation In Proceedings Of Restitution Of Conjugal Rights?

Human Rights Courts Under the Protection of Human Rights Act: Structure and Jurisdiction (Section 30)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?