By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 43 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Power To Remove Difficulties.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > DPDP > Section 43 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Power To Remove Difficulties.
DPDP

Section 43 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Power To Remove Difficulties.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 14, 2025 12:30 pm
Apni Law
4 months ago
Share
Section 43 - Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) - Power To Remove Difficulties
Section 43 - Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) - Power To Remove Difficulties
SHARE

Code: Section 43 DPDP Act

(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central
Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not
inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as may appear to it to be necessary or expedient
for removing the difficulty.
(2) No order as referred to in sub-section (1) shall be made after the expiry of three
years from the date of commencement of this Act.
(3) Every order made under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is
made, before each House of Parliament.

Explanation of Section 43 DPDP

Section 43 gives the Central Government limited power to resolve any problems that arise while implementing the DPDP Act. If the law is unclear in a specific situation or creates confusion, the government can issue an official order to clarify it. This process ensures that the Act remains functional during its early stages of enforcement.

Contents
Code: Section 43 DPDP ActExplanation of Section 43 DPDPKey PointsIllustrationExample: Early Clarification Within Three YearsCommon Questions and Answers on Section 43 DPDPConclusion

However, this power is temporary. The government can only issue such orders within three years from the date the Act begins. After that, any changes or clarifications must come through formal amendments to the law.

Every such order must also be shared with Parliament, which ensures democratic oversight.

Key Points

  • The government can issue clarifying orders if any difficulty arises in applying the Act.
  • These orders must not go against the original provisions of the law.
  • This power is limited to a three-year period after the Act starts.
  • All orders must be presented before both Houses of Parliament.

—

Illustration

Example: Early Clarification Within Three Years

Suppose a clause in the DPDP Act is unclear about how data fiduciaries should report breaches. If this ambiguity affects implementation, the Central Government can issue a clarifying order. For instance, it may outline how and when reporting should happen.

If the Act came into force on July 1, 2023, the government can issue such an order until June 30, 2026. After that date, any changes must go through Parliament via a formal amendment.

—

Common Questions and Answers on Section 43 DPDP

  1. Why does Section 43 exist?

It helps the government solve practical challenges in applying the law. Sometimes, small gaps or unclear wording make implementation difficult. Section 43 offers a quick fix during the initial rollout phase.

  1. What limits apply to this power?

The government can’t use this power to contradict the Act. Also, it can only use this authority within three years from the start of the Act.

  1. What happens after three years?

After the three-year window closes, the government must follow the regular legislative process to make changes—this includes debates and approval in Parliament.

  1. Who oversees these government orders?

Each order must be laid before both Houses of Parliament. This gives lawmakers the chance to review, question, or even suggest changes.

  1. Is this a common clause in Indian laws?

Yes. Many major laws include a similar “removal of difficulties” provision to allow for smoother early-stage enforcement.

—

Conclusion

Section 43 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act is a practical safeguard. It lets the Central Government clear up issues that may arise during the early implementation of the law. At the same time, it sets firm boundaries by limiting the time window and requiring parliamentary oversight. This ensures that the law stays flexible without compromising accountability.

For more simplified legal explanations and updates, visit ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 32 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Voluntary Undertaking.

Section 6 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Consent.

Section 16 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Processing Of Personal Data Outside India.

Section 42 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Power To Amend Schedule.

Section 13 – Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) – Right Of Grievance Redressal.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Women in Distress Virginity Test Violates Women’s Dignity Under Article 21: Chattisgarh HC
Next Article Grounds For Divorce Mother Cannot Mask Paternity Even When Addicted To Vices In Child’s Birth Record: Bombay HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
All About Child Custody
Child CustodyFamilyMarriage and DivorceNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Financial Security Alone Not Important But Physical And Mental Factors To Maintain Custody of Child: Punjab And Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Mediation Is Only Permissible When Both Parties Agree To It: SC
Child Deemed Legitimate If Married Couple Had Access During Conception, Rules Supreme Court
What Are The Legal Rights and Responsibilities of International Students in India
Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?