By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 346 CrPC: Court’s Decision to Proceed Beyond Summary Trial
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 346 CrPC: Court’s Decision to Proceed Beyond Summary Trial
CrPC

Section 346 CrPC: Court’s Decision to Proceed Beyond Summary Trial

Apni Law
Last updated: November 26, 2024 8:20 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 346 CrPC: Court’s Decision to Proceed Beyond Summary Trial

Contents
1. State the code2. Explain it3. Illustrate it4. Common Questions and AnswersQ: What is a summary trial?Q: When does a Magistrate opt for a summary trial?Q: What are the consequences of a transfer to the Sessions Court?

1. State the code

Section 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 deals with the court’s decision to proceed beyond summary trial in certain circumstances.

2. Explain it

This section outlines the situations where a Magistrate, who initially opts for a summary trial, can decide to proceed with a regular trial instead. This happens when:

The accused, during the summary trial, pleads not guilty or claims that the Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to try the case.

  • The Magistrate, during the summary trial, believes that the case is not suitable for summary trial due to the complexity of the charges or the nature of the evidence.

In such scenarios, the Magistrate will transfer the case to the Sessions Court for a regular trial.

3. Illustrate it

Consider a case where a person is accused of stealing a mobile phone. The Magistrate initiates a summary trial. However, during the trial, the accused denies the charges and claims that the phone was actually gifted to them. The Magistrate, after examining the evidence, finds that the case is not suitable for a summary trial due to the conflicting claims and the need for further investigation. In this case, the Magistrate will use Section 346 to transfer the case to the Sessions Court for a regular trial.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q: What is a summary trial?

A: A summary trial is a simplified and expedited trial process for minor offenses. It is conducted by a Magistrate without the need for a formal jury or elaborate procedures.

Q: When does a Magistrate opt for a summary trial?

A: A Magistrate can opt for a summary trial if the offense is punishable with a maximum sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine, or both. The Magistrate must also be satisfied that the case is suitable for summary trial.

Q: What are the consequences of a transfer to the Sessions Court?

A: Transferring the case to the Sessions Court means that the case will be tried under the regular trial procedures, which are more elaborate and time-consuming.

You Might Also Like

Section 102 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Direction, Etc., Of Search-Warrants.

Section 292 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Report Of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition To Be Submitted Before Court.

195A IPC: Threatening False Evidence in India – Legal Definition and Penalties

Section 52 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Examination Of Person Accused Of Rape By Medical Practitioner.

Section 21 CrPC: Special Executive Magistrates – Powers and Functions under Code of Criminal Procedure

TAGGED:Court DecisionCourt of LawCriminal JusticeCriminal ProcedureCrPC 346Indian Lawjustice systemlegal proceedingsProcedural LawSummary TrialTrial Process
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) Section 34 CrPC: Withdrawal of Powers – Code of Criminal Procedure
Next Article Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) CrPC Section 35: Powers of Judges and Magistrates Succeeding in Office
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Declines Plea To Reinstate Section 377 In Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
News

Supreme Court Declines Plea To Reinstate Section 377 In Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
9 months ago
Dowry Death Conviction Requires Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death: Calcutta High Court
Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam
Not Informing Grounds of Arrest Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 22: Kerala HC
Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision Allowing Defendant To File Written Statement After 17-Year Delay
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?