By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 162 CrPC: Statements to Police – Admissibility in Evidence
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 162 CrPC: Statements to Police – Admissibility in Evidence
CrPC

Section 162 CrPC: Statements to Police – Admissibility in Evidence

Apni Law
Last updated: May 26, 2024 12:06 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 162 CrPC: Statements to Police – Admissibility in Evidence

Contents
1. The Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:

1. The Code:

Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the admissibility of statements made to the police during an investigation.

2. Explanation:

Section 162 states that any statement made by a person to a police officer during an investigation is:

  • Not admissible in evidence against the person who made it, in any inquiry, trial, or other proceeding.
  • Admissible in evidence in certain specific circumstances, as detailed in the section.

This section aims to protect individuals from self-incrimination and ensure that statements made under duress or pressure are not used against them in court.

3. Illustration:

Suppose a person is arrested by the police for theft. During questioning, the person confesses to the crime. This confession, made to the police officer, is inadmissible in court against the person under Section 162.

However, if the person later contradicts their testimony in court, the statement made to the police can be used to prove the inconsistency.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: Can any statement made to the police be used in court?

A: No. Only certain statements, as specified in Section 162, are admissible in evidence.

Q: What are the circumstances under which statements to the police can be admitted as evidence?

A: Statements can be used for:

  • Contradicting a witness’s testimony in court.
  • Proving the witness’s previous statement.
  • Proving the person’s conduct.

Q: Can the accused be forced to give a statement to the police?

A: No. The accused has the right to remain silent and cannot be compelled to give a statement to the police.

You Might Also Like

Section 271 CrPC: Issuing Commission for Witness Examination in Prison – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 221 CrPC: Doubtful Offense – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 81 CrPC: Magistrate Procedure for Arrested Persons – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 194 CrPC: Powers of Additional and Assistant Sessions Judges in India

CrPC Section 128: Enforcement of Maintenance Orders

TAGGED:- CrPC - Section 162 - Police Statements - Admissibility - Evidence - Criminal Procedure - Indian Law - Legal - Law - Criminal Justice - Legal Proceedings - Court Proceedings
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 218: Separate Charges for Distinct Offences – Explained
Next Article Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench
News

Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court: Pendency Of Another Trial Cannot Bar Suspension Of Sentence
Supreme Court Orders Survey of Karnataka Mines for Rehabilitation Plans
No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court
Blood-Stained Weapon Not Enough for Murder Conviction: SC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?